Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Poly has no more to do with swinging than nudisim does. I've noticed a few profiles on SLS looking for "friends first" or some other code speak for "we want a relationship", exactly what swinging isn't. Some swingers may transition into poly relationships over time, just as some nudists may transition into swingers, but I don't think it's the norm.

 

This post in another thread got me thinking... In my mind "friends first" swinging and poly are two completely different things, but other people apparently think of them as one and the same. What does everyone else think?

 

To expand on my views (the rest of the post is purely my opinion :) ).. Everyone I have met who wants to be friends first is looking more for a sense of safety by knowing people a bit before having sex. Whether or not this is legit or not is another topic, but it's something that people believe. Also, friends first folks tend to want to be more open about swinging - having that couple or two or five that you swing with AND hang out with gives you the chance to talk about swinging, be yourselves, and generally not have to be in the closet about it. At least every once in a while. Having a friendship makes things a bit more comfortable for some.

 

Polyamory, on the other hand, is actually looking for romantic love. I love my friends, but that doesn't mean I'm in a poly relationship with all of them. On SLS, I mention that we are looking for friends, but we do not consider anyone we meet on SLS (or other swinging sites) as people with whom we could potentially have a real, whole, romantic relationship.

 

I guess my general question is - Is this a common thought in people's minds? When you see someone looking for "friends first" does your mind automatically go to poly/relationships/too invested?

Share this post


Link to post

My thoughts match your thoughts on this.

 

We have quite a few swinger friends that we love. Mrs two4you even says "Love you!" to a few of them. But, it's what we call "Swinger Love". Just like you have vanilla friends that you love/adore. It isn't romantic, and for us, it isn't going to become romantic or poly in any form.

 

Friends first doesn't make me think Poly at all.

 

For the record, we don't look for friends first. We thought that was what we wanted when we first started swinging, but it took all of one club night to change our minds about that.

Share this post


Link to post

We don't need friends first, but it happened with one couple we know well. It was basically, just a matter of not being able to schedule play time but being able to see them multiple times in more vanilla situations. We have played a couple times since getting to know them as friends. It's not a poly situation at all, but we are friends.

 

Friends first is definitely not something we look for or feel the need to do, so I can't really comment whether people who feel prior friendship is essential are really looking for poly relationships. I can say that becoming friends first doesn't automatically lead to poly.

 

Honestly, I think friends first is really difficult and people mislead themselves. We have friends we've played with many times over more than 3y, but really how well do we know them? Not that well. We call them friends, but are they really? Not really. I think it takes a lot of shared time, interests and experiences to create a friendship. I think people are just making themselves feel better by saying they just have casual sex with friends (it sounds better than sex with strangers to many people).

Share this post


Link to post

My thoughts match yours, as well, km. Although, I can see how "friends first" can also be a code for some people to hint toward poly, just like "opened minded" can be a code to bi-sexual male play.

 

There was a time, and perhaps occasionally I still think this, but when I saw "friends first" I would think that they were newbies who wanted to be comfortable with a couple before jumping into their first swinging experience.

 

On SLS, I mention that we are looking for friends, but we do not consider anyone we meet on SLS (or other swinging sites) as people with whom we could potentially have a real, whole, romantic relationship.

 

I was curious as to why you automatically rule out everyone on SLS/swinging sites as being potential romantic interests. Is it because you assume that they are mostly there to swing and don't want to filter through any that might be leaning toward poly?

Share this post


Link to post

I think of the term friends first as an indicator that one or both in the couple are not comfortable with casual sex with strangers. They have to feel comfortable or a sense of companionship.

 

That's not love nor a committed relationship so I don't think of it as poly.

 

 

The Rose

Share this post


Link to post

We agree with two4you on this with the exception that we do look for friends first and we like a little romantic attachment but it's not poly. Could we see ourselves somewhere in the middle, yes and no. We have mixed feelings and maybe even a couple mixed posts over the years we have been on this board on this particular subject. We have two very close friends and we tell them we love them all the time but we are not 'in love' with them.

Share this post


Link to post

I think that "friends first" and "poly" are two different things but that both fall under the umbrella of SWINGING (consensual sex with others outside of your marriage/primary relationship). I agree with others that many are looking for "friends first" more for a sense of safety. Most don't mean they want to be "besties" they just want to get to know people before they play and feel comfortable with them. Poly is actual romantic attached relationship. That said, I know quite a few folks involved in poly who also swing outside of their poly relationship(s). We have a threesome at our local social. They live together and play together, but they also play outside of their threesome.

Share this post


Link to post
I was curious as to why you automatically rule out everyone on SLS/swinging sites as being potential romantic interests. Is it because you assume that they are mostly there to swing and don't want to filter through any that might be leaning toward poly?

 

We don't rule them out entirely, I suppose, but we treat them much as we would treat people we meet at work or other parts of the community that aren't specifically geared towards poly people - they aren't potential partners unless they bring it up as a possibility first. We tend to compartmentalize based on how/where we meet people. Folks from SLS/swingers clubs/other swing venues - swingers. Folks from a poly event/site- poly. Coworkers/fellow church attenders/etc - vanilla acquaintances. There are crossovers, but until we've learned that about the person, we use the basic idea of what they are open to as a guide of how to treat them and what to expect/not expect from them.

Share this post


Link to post
We don't rule them out entirely, I suppose, but we treat them much as we would treat people we meet at work or other parts of the community that aren't specifically geared towards poly people - they aren't potential partners unless they bring it up as a possibility first. We tend to compartmentalize based on how/where we meet people. Folks from SLS/swingers clubs/other swing venues - swingers. Folks from a poly event/site- poly. Coworkers/fellow church attenders/etc - vanilla acquaintances. There are crossovers, but until we've learned that about the person, we use the basic idea of what they are open to as a guide of how to treat them and what to expect/not expect from them.

 

That does keep things very simple. :) Good strategy!

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By Mr. Truelove
      Two questions mostly directed to the male half of the swinging couples. Women, feel free to respond, your input is always valued.
       
      How important is it that you like the other guy that you plan to swing with in the heterosexual manner, either in a MFM or in a MFMF? Does he have to be respectable? Is it up to the woman? Do you have any standards whatsoever?
       
      Also, to the more experienced folk, is it uncommon that the guys would get along really well?
       
      Personally I found it very important that the guy my wife would have would be someone that I respected, or at least someone I thought was "good enough" for my wife. Perhaps it was my protective nature, or something. But I felt that it was important.
    • By couplers
      Hi this is Petra, member of a three-woman, two-guy closed poly family. I am a long-time member of the Swingersboard, so if you want more background, you can look at previous posts. We are all now in our thirties and have found that while it used to be that the two guys could adequately take care of us three women, that is shifting. The guys have slacked off a little, while the women's desire for sex has increased. While it helps that we girls are bisexual and can help each other, we also seem to need (or at least want) more frequent sex with the guys. Penis-in-vagina intercourse is what we girls want, and the three of us women cum relatively easily, so a quick screw is satisfying.
       
      Anyone else facing a similar situation? The way we have primarily addressed this is by making one of our guys service two girls, her cumming while he holds back, then taking care of the second. Any thoughts?
    • By JW6145
      I’ve been lurking a while and read a ton here the boards. Now I’ve gotten myself into a situation that is not talked about very much on here. I’ve fallen in love with a playmate. I really didn’t mean for it to happen, and from what she tells me she didn’t mean for it to happen either. Let me start by saying I’ve been completely open and 100% honest with my wife, and my playmate Becca tells me that she has been mostly open with her husband. We’ll get to that in a bit.
       
      Becca and I met at a club, just a few months ago. From the first I thought she was attractive, I mean let’s face it, we’re here to fuck attractive people, right? My wife, Angie, and I went to the club that night to have some fun. We’re experienced swingers-we don’t play alot, swinging does not rule our lives- but we’ve had our share of fun. The night I met Becca was no different; we hoped to meet some fun people, have some good to great sex, and maybe make some friends we could hang out with on a regular basis.
       
      Becca and I both realized pretty quickly that there is a strong physical attraction between the two of us. The sex is effortless and I’ve never fit together with anyone better. After that first night of being together, my wife Angie and Becca’s husband Rob exchanged numbers. Becca asked for my number but I declined, telling her she could just text Angie if she wanted. I don’t normally like to have communication with the women I play with outside of swinging situations. I was not able to get Becca out of my head for the next several days- which is unusual for me. I threw caution to the wind sent her my number via SLS. She texted me a few hours later. Over the next several days we exchanged texts and even spoke on the phone a few times. All with Angie’s knowledge.
       
      We all four got together again a few weeks later-and it was even better than the first time. It was that night that I recognized that I had developed emotional feelings for Becca, and I was pretty sure that she had developed similar feelings for me.
       
      A few days after we were all together the second time I told my wife about my feelings for Becca. I told her I didn’t know if I was getting our sexual chemistry mixed up with emotion but I thought that could be the case. To my surprise Angie did not freak out. She told me she suspected something was up-given the amount of communication between Becca and I. I took a few weeks to sort out my feelings and spent many more hours talking to both Angie and Becca. I realized that I was probably in love with Becca. And I told them both so. Becca told me she feels the same way. This is not the “oh, I’ve just fucked someone new, I hope they like me best” kind of feeling. We’ve both been with other people since we met and it has not cooled our emotions. This is raw, real and deep.
       
      When I told Angie all of this she gave me license to pursue a relationship with Becca and follow it wherever it may lead. I did not ask for this, Angie offered it to me. Angie is secure about our commitment to each other-I am not leaving my wife and Becca and Angie both know that. Becca also has no intention of leaving her husband.
       
      Becca has talked with her husband Rob about us and the feelings we’ve developed for each other. What she has not told him is that she thinks loves me, she does not know how he would react to that (here is the mostly open part that I alluded to in the first paragraph). She has told him our feelings are deep but has not gone into how much we care for each other. Rob is completely comfortable with texts and calls throughout the day, but not with Becca and I meeting without him and Angie there-even for lunch or dinner. I completely understand and respect this. I don’t like it, but I respect it. I suspect if the shoe were on the other foot I would feel the same way. I really genuinely like Rob by the way, he treats both Becca and Angie really well-and he and Angie have really great sex together. Angie has told Rob that it’s just sex between the two of them and Rob feels the same way. They have no other feelings for each other past that.
       
      Becca and I text every day and talk several times a week; I know about her life and children, and she knows about mine. We have similar interests and lives outside of swinging, we are in similar businesses. We have become emotional rocks for each other. I get emotional needs met from her that I do not get from Angie. Again, I have been upfront with Angie about all this and she is fine with it.
       
      So here are my big questions: Do these things really ever work, or are we on the express train to Dramaville?
       
      Is it possible to keep something like this going long term?
       
      How do we navigate the fact that Rob is not comfortable with Becca and I meeting without him around (again, we will not be going against his wishes on this one) and knowing that he and Angie will want to have more variety in their swinging soon, which will leave less opportunity for Becca and I to be together?
       
      Any thoughts from the wise sages on here are welcome. I’m a big boy-if I’ve being naïve about anything please tell me. I can take it.
    • By Bluespruce1
      We have been playing with a couple for about five years on and off. We see them at our club, at some resorts and at local house parties. Wherever we are, she always seeks out my husband. We have all been together many times and I enjoy her husband very much, but for my husband and I, it’s literally just sex.
       
      She is very different with my husband lately than with her other partners. I believe she has fallen for him. When I see them together, she is very passionate and attentive to him in ways that I don’t see when she’s with other men. My husband rolls with it and is always a pleaser.
       
      We don’t want to make things uncomfortable or lose their friendship, but we are getting uncomfortable with the notion that she may be interested in a deeper relationship than we have experienced with other partners.
       
      Should we just go with it? I’m not sure I can handle sharing him that way and I don’t think he’s interested in that type of relationship either. Thoughts about when the sex leads to something more?
×
×
  • Create New...