Ok, Guys your thoughts on Gang Bangs

[PANDADDS05]

Originally Posted by VegasLee

Lately I have noticed that someone seems to have a very low opinion of men that participate in things that he is not involved in.

Trailer parks? Not dateable?

Seems that maybe someone has had limited experiences or maybe just us people on the west coast get out more, I am not sure which.

This is not the first post with the same tones to it.

Just because something is "not your cup of tea" does not mean that others that do things you don't live under a rock or come from trailer parks.

There is many lovely ladies in our play group have done gang bangs, orgies and many other things that they love and so do the VERY DATEABLE guys that party with them. Last I looked, none of them lived in a trailer park, which personally I would not see anything wrong with anyway. Many of them do own motor homes that cost more then most houses though so maybe they are on the lower side of life.

Once again seems that some people feel the need to judge others, set standards for others or look down on others just because they don't think the same way as they do.

This lifestyle is about us being open, honest and not judgeing others for their desires in life. Seems lately some people feel the need to forget that part of it.

Stop thinking so much, have fun in life and keep it simple.

Buddy, this is typical American Femnazi bull. As usually, in our estrogen saturated society, men have totally forgotten how to stand up to women's incompetence. Most men put up with women's incompetence to keep the peace. I don't. I don't intended to keep the peace, but intended to keep things righteous in my presence of greatness that radiates from me. I made a remarkable display of my greatness in a bank this week by telling off the whole female management staff after they went brain dead on understanding international monetary transactions - which I lectured them on also, right on the spot and of course, in the presence of other customers. Side note: In the US, banks are mostly run by women - tellers, managers, etc., and they, of course, are extremely inefficient in my glorious perspective. As I finished my lecture to these incompetent women managers, I proceed to call the bank headquarters myself (I was at a branch bank location) and lecture them on this branch bank's incompetent managers, in which, I was given apologies and condolences by the bank headquarters and which then set my international monetary transactions straight. This is what must be done by men - calling out women's incompetence and letting everybody know so corrective actions can take place - take no incompetence to just keep the peace.

[northindycpl]

Originally Posted by PANDADDS05

This is what must be done by men - calling out women's incompetence and letting everybody know so corrective actions can take place - take no incompetence to just keep the peace.

It's getting harder and harder to cash those welfare checks, isn't it buddy ?

[VegasLee]

PANDADDS05,

When you can have respect for all genders can you give me a clue what your post had to do with my post or anything else for that matter?

Men are no better then any women on the face of this earth and if you had a clue at all you would know that.

Good luck to you in what ever it is you are trying to prove.

[JustAskJulie]

Originally Posted by VegasLee

PANDADDS05,

When you can have respect for all genders can you give me a clue what your post had to do with my post or anything else for that matter?

Men are no better then any women on the face of this earth and if you had a clue at all you would know that.

Good luck to you in what ever it is you are trying to prove.

Not to worry Lee, thanks to his complete lack of respect to all genders (and users on this forum) he only lasted an hour here.

[jennandjamesinm]

Originally Posted by JustAskJulie

Not to worry Lee, thanks to his complete lack of respect to all genders (and users on this forum) he only lasted an hour here.

Go Julie!!!

Jenn

[WesternSwing]

I can see where some men and women get off on gang bangs. In fact we know some. However, it is nothing we would ever want to participate in. A single male we have played with calle me last weekend with a "moral dilema" about exactly this. He had been invited to participate in a gang bang with two women and ten or so men. I told him "yeah, if it turns you on this could be a once in a lifetime chance to check this off you fantasy list." So he went. Out of ten men invited and confirmed, only him and two others showed-up. It would seem that for the others the fantasy was hotter then the reality of the gang bang.

Does it make another male or female less attractive to us to play with? No. That's their gig when they want it. It has nothing to do with us and our activities that night.

Mr. WS

[JustAskJulie]

Originally Posted by WesternSwing

Out of ten men invited and confirmed, only him and two others showed-up. It would seem that for the others the fantasy was hotter then the reality of the gang bang.

Mr. WS

This is fairly typical, you are lucky if half of those you invite show up, so you have to invite twice as many as you want.

If you check into it, even on the supposed "World Record GBs" (the ones on video) it's not really 100 or 500 (or whatever the # is) different guys, it's actually maybe 30-50 (in those cases) rotating out.

IMO, there's two different types of GB's, a GB where the girl is the center of attention and getting said attention from more than one guy at a time (and giving attention to more than one guy at a time) and a train. The latter, unfortunately, is what most people invision when they think of a GB, a long line of guys waiting, cock in hand, to have sex with a girl as she lies back and takes them on. That's not my idea of fun.

[intuition897]

Originally Posted by JustAskJulie

Not to worry Lee, thanks to his complete lack of respect to all genders (and users on this forum) he only lasted an hour here.

He managed to put 7 posts in in an hour; yeah, he knew his moments here were numbered before he even signed up. That's not criticism! The guy just acted fast because he's a shit disturber and he knows it.

[hilltop]

Originally Posted by intuition897

He managed to put 7 posts in in an hour; yeah, he knew his moments here were numbered before he even signed up. That's not criticism! The guy just acted fast because he's a shit disturber and he knows it.

It was a drive-by.
Pop in, flame the hell outta the place and move on.

The more sensitive the subject matter of the board the better.

No shortage of damaged souls out there.

[tncinmd]

You know what's strange ? "Swingers" who get on their pulpit and proclaim they'd never participate in a gangbang with 14 other guys. They would, however, have sex with a woman who'd had sex with 14 other guys one at a time over a longer period.

We've had over 3 dozen mfm's and one mmfm and the wife loves 'em. She definitely wants to try more. We also enjoy couple-to-couple as well as house and hotel parties. We see nothing incongruous about liking all aspects of playing with others. We don't mind that others pick and choose thier activities. We do find it ridiculous when they rag on others about others' choices.

[xxoticangel]

We talked this weekend about setting up a GB for her upcoming birthday. It has always been a fantasy of hers and we have fantasized about it for years. However, when we sat down to write the ad and start looking for potential playmates she decided that she would not be able to give the kind of attention she likes to give if there were more than 3 guys there. Our original plan was to arrange for 5-10 guys to show up (hoping that at least 4 would actually show). We discussed it further and I discovered that, while still a fantasy, she would probably not be comfortable with more than 3.

Back in my military days I participated in a few (more than 3) GBs. There were two very hot girls that loved to hang out at the barracks and they made it a point to welcome all new troops to the base. Almost every Saturday night these two would take on just about anyone that wanted in. I can remember one afternoon I walked into my room to find one girl on her back in my bed being serviced by two guys and her friend on my roommate's bed getting one from behind while giving oral to another across the footboard. There were two tvs playing porn and about 12 buys standing around drinking and urging the other guys on. This was in '84 so there were on condoms being used and the girls were completely covered with cum.

We live by the credo "Your kink is OK even if it isn't our kink."

[midnight hour]

Just because something is "not your cup of tea" does not mean that others that do things you don't live under a rock or come from trailer parks.

I too am hearing this more and more..trailer park trash...are swingers becoming the ultimate snobs?
Reminds me of those words in the Matchbox song..*same old trailer trash in new shoes* they seem to throw it out there to protect themselves from some form of judgement..
Sometimes with 5 acres of grass and woods I wished I did live in a trailer park
Some very nice people come from within...too bad a lot of people won't get to know them because their own noses are so high.
JNCC you are exactly the kind of person I go out of my way to avoid in all situations. You have little to offer in insight because the only things that matter are your thoughts. Not open minded at all. If you do not/will not do it or sleep with a woman who has, get over it and go on..you don't have to keep harping about it
I have never thought of a large one, a small one perhaps 4 or so gentlemen maybe quite the thrill facelick I know it would be a huge turn on to Mr. Midnite as his number one fantasy is me with other men.
I would like to see one...so far I have not been lucky enough to wander across one...

midnite hour

[JnCC]

Originally Posted by Spoomonkey

But that is personal taste - and not based on ignorant prejudices or too many visits to a certain swim club that has a definite "flavor" all its own. (...ahem...)

Just for the record, both GB's I witnessed happened at LaPlase, about a year before they closed down. And yes, that certain "swim" club you mentioned does have a "flavor" all it own. But it's also the only club in the area that still draws a decent crowd on weekends. The others are either "nice but poorly attended," or managed by somewhat rude people. All tend to draw the same kinds of people...just fewer of them.

BTW, most people in the lifestyle, both singles and couples, have certain things they're looking for in others...things they'll do and things they won't do. Some of those things are based on past experience (tried it and didn't like it), or on reasonable expectation based on known behavior ("the way they talk about others, they'll probably be talking about me when I'm not around") Sometimes their preferences have absolutely no logical basis in fact, they're just things they don't find attractive, or don't care to participate in (ugly feet, older or younger, anal play, other races)

My question to you is..."Why are your preferences a "matter of personal taste," while mine are "based on ignorant prejudices or too many visits to a certain swim club?" Is that how you and Mrs Monkey respond to new couples at your club who aren't into the same things as you, or who don't play by the same rules as you do?

I gather from your previous posts that you and Mrs S insist on the use of condoms in your play. I assume that you avoid people whom engage in high-risk behaviors as well. Apparently, this is where your "preference" becomes my "ignorant prejudice"...I don't play with the partners of people who engage in high-risk behaviors either.

NO method of protection is 100% effective in protecting against STD's (about 15% of all new cases of syphilis are transmitted through oral sex). If adding another layer of protection makes me "ignorant and prejudiced," then ignorant and prejudiced I be. But I won't be bullied or coerced into doing something that could put my personal health, or to that of my subsequent partners, at risk.

Many new couples check into this site to learn as much as possible about the lifestyle prior to their first experience. For their sake, I hope your response to my "rules"...as "ignorant and prejudiced" as you may perceive them, will be seen for what it is...a personal commentary on me, and not reflective of how their limits will be addressed by the rest of the people they're likely to encounter in the lifestyle.

[JnCC]

Originally Posted by midnight hour

JNCC you are exactly the kind of person I go out of my way to avoid in all situations. You have little to offer in insight because the only things that matter are your thoughts. Not open minded at all. If you do not/will not do it or sleep with a woman who has, get over it and go on..you don't have to keep harping about it

So I guess this means I won't be hearing from you when you and the Mr are looking for that "Special 16th" for your next GB?

[Spoomonkey]

Originally Posted by JnCC

My question to you is..."Why are your preferences a "matter of personal taste," while mine are "based on ignorant prejudices or too many visits to a certain swim club?" Is that how you and Mrs Monkey respond to new couples at your club who aren't into the same things as you, or who don't play by the same rules as you do?

Easy...

I've never genralized and ridiculed and entire group of people simply because I didn't like what they did.

Spoomonkey