Jump to content
sunbuckus

Are the labels "primary" and "secondary" more hurtful than than helpful?

Recommended Posts

Back when we dipped our pinky toe 1/8th of a way into the poly pool, we used the term "primary" as a way to show that someone took first priority over any other boyfriend/girlfriend. While I like to have things organized and feel comforted in the knowledge that certain people are important to me...it chafes me to think that I may have used this terminology in a way that may have made others feel like a second-class human being. We also used "primary" as a way to protect our marriage. But as More Than Two's page states--protect it from what?

 

Quote
What I mean by that is that many people start their polyamorous relationships from the perspective that polyamory itself is inherently destructive, you can't reasonably expect your poly relationships to be healthy and positive, and if you don't ride herd on them all the time and manage your relationships and your partner's behavior strictly, all that will happen is you'll lose everything.

 

You see this in the language that people use to describe their relationships. "Well, we do primary/secondary in order to protect the primary relationship." Protect the primary relationship? Protect it from what? The basic premise is that if you DON'T do primary/secondary, then you'll automatically find yourself in a situation that destroys the primary relationship; after all, if that were not the case, why would you need these structures to "protect" the existing relationship in the first place? If you believe that you need these rules in order to make sure your needs are met, then what is it that makes you think that another person's needs must automatically come at the expense of your own?

 

So is the use of primary/secondary more destructive and/or negative than it is helpful?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post

I think that would depend on the person(s). One thing all swingers/poly have is we can exist outside of the vanilla box. How far we get outside the box before we start to get uncomfortable depends on the individual. For some, using that sort of terminology is probably what gives them the comfort to be open to exploring poly. They have it clear in their mind that they can always retreat back to what they consider the most important to them, their primary. For others, they are comfortable to get out of the box and then just walk away with nary a thought. People with that level of comfort probably would find those terms less necessary and in fact more of a negative than a positive.

 

I think the swinging corollary would be rules like no kissing, always finish with each other, etc. Some people are more comfortable using some mechanism, whether it be a term or some limitation, to keep a hierarchy or as you put it, keep things organized. It's just something they need to get the necessary comfort level.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post

Great points, cplnuswing! I hadn't thought about it in that way! :) I guess I was focusing more on how the others that aren't in the primary relationship would feel being called/treated a secondary.

Share this post


Link to post
sunbuckus said:
So is the use of primary/secondary more destructive and/or negative than it is helpful?

 

We never use primary/secondary. It is loaded terminology that often confuses.

 

Our relationships are what they are. Although David and I are married, we don't consider Red and Clair "secondaries," and if it were up to me, we would be in some other sort of social/legal arrangement. We previously discussed doing all sorts of crazy things within the existing legal framework, e.g. David and I divorce, then Clair and I marry where it is legal, then David/Clair marry and Red/I marry where Clair and my same sex marriages is not recognized, etc. With the children now we've just set up guardianships and trusts the best we can. It gets complicated quickly, and will become more so when we have more children and mine is with Red. According to our lawyers, the biggest problem is that regardless of how well thought out and funded a plan for the children is, if something happens to a natural parent (or worse the natural parents), the judge doesn't have to follow the wishes of the dead parents.

Share this post


Link to post
Great points, cplnuswing! I hadn't thought about it in that way! :) I guess I was focusing more on how the others that aren't in the primary relationship would feel being called/treated a secondary.

 

Language is a tricky thing. Words carry meanings that we don't always intend and even carry different meanings to different people.

 

In my current sort of/maybe poly relationship, I would classify myself as a "secondary." However, my poly partner has never, that I can recall, actually used that term. She has referred to us as "play partners" or "friends with benefits", while she also has a wife and a boyfriend (as well as a full time job which demands extensive overtime). The implication remains, when allocating her limited time among her various partners there is a hierarchy of sorts. I actually keep meaning to talk to her about this, just to get a better handle on her feelings about it (and about me), but when I do have time with her I can find any number of more pleasant things to discuss. :)

 

As you know Sunbuckus, I do sometimes feel envious of being "secondary" (regardless of the term used) but at the same time I try to accept it as a fact of life. There are only so many days in a month and one person's attention can only be divided so many different ways within that limited span.

 

We used words like friend, family, lover, colleague, acquaintance, etc to describe and define our relationships with people, but reality is always so much more complex than mere language.

Share this post


Link to post

If we were ever in a poly type situation, I don't think I would use those words. However, I think it would be understood where my priority lies. As far as the quoted information- I can completely understand the instinct to "protect" the "primary" relationship. My "primary" relationship would get the majority of my time. I would take sides with my husband (even if I didn't agree with him) in any instance where a choice needed to be made.

 

All of that being said mainly because if we were in a poly relationship I don't think we all would live as a family. The situation with Petra and company is different IMO. You live as a family and make choices as a family. You all spend time as a family. I would never (never say never!) do that. So our time would have to be split between family and gf/bf.

 

And that is why poly is just too complicated for me :) I am not social. I hate talking on the phone. I hate dating. I'm selfish and like things comfortable. I can be that way with SSH so there isn't much, if any, room for anyone else.

Share this post


Link to post

I have a problem with blogs like, "More than Two", because they idealise what poly should be. It's just being ignorant to think that every relationship is equal or can ever be equal. People put way too much emphasis on a word and not enough on real life situations. It's as though the poly people write like poly relationships are one way or another and completely set aside the fact that no generalization is good. Just like every marriage is different so to is every poly relationship. Just as what works in my marriage may not work in yours, the same is true for Poly relationships. Over generalization does one no favors here.

 

Take my experience as an illustration: I have been married for 21 years next week to my college sweet heart. I also have a girlfriend I've had the pleasure of learning to love deeply over the past 2 years. It would be silly to compare the love I have for my wife with the love I have for my girlfriend. Not because I love my girlfriend less but because I simply don't have the vested life experience with her that I have withy wife. In that sense my wife is my primary and my girlfriend is my secondary. It has nothing to do with protecting the primary but just is rooted

In the fact that I've loved one and built a life with her and not the other yet! This isn't putting the secondary down, it isn't making her any less important. Any more than having a second child makes the first less important. It's just a statement of fact re the depth of the first vs the second relationship.

 

If the way you understand primary and secondary poly relationships is in the sense of one relationship is secondary to other because the primary has to be protected then I would say the secondary relationship is bound to fail. Not because there isnt any love or commitment, but because the secondary in that sense, is not being allowed to progress.

 

But I don't think most poly people understand primary and secondary in that way. Putting that sense up as why primary and secondary are bound to fail is putting up a straw man argument. And it certainly completely ignores the facts on the ground in the vast majority of poly relationships. Those facts being that except for rare cases one relationship is always newer and less developed than the other.

 

There isn't a "true kind of poly" any more than there is "true kind of monogamy" or "true kind of swinging".

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Just like every marriage is different so to is every poly relationship. Just as what works in my marriage may not work in yours, the same is true for Poly relationships. Over generalization does one no favors here.

 

 

While I agree that generalizations don't work for everyone, I think that some overall generalizations are beneficial. For example, if anyone who comes to Swingersboard.com, if they walk away with anything, it's that we hold in high regard that communication is very important in order for swinging to work. If we didn't work very well, we wouldn't harp on it so often.

 

For me, and this can differ for everyone else, but there is a difference between assigning a "primary" and "secondary" to relationships and designating first/second/third/etc. to children. With relationships, "primary" and "secondary" seem to hold the connotation that one is more important or has higher priority. While this may not be true for some poly relationships, it can be for others and in doing so, I can see how assigning relationships in that manner can be a way of setting them up to fail. With children, society just normally designates that multiple children in one family be called first, second, third, fourth, etc. Now, in some societies, birth order can mean more importance (for example, the first born male is most important because they inherit the family house/business/country/whatever) but I would think that here in the US, the order of one's birth doesn't matter.

 

I know, I know...children psychologists and sociologists will argue that we treat our children differently depending on their birth order (strict with the first, spoil the youngest, etc.) but I don't see one child as being more important than another. However, even though I don't see them as differing in importance, the children might feel it. How often do we hear of siblings being jealous of another sibling because they get more attention, more toys, or were born first/second/third? Perhaps it is natural to feel these types of feelings...we just have to learn how to address them and come to terms with them.

Share this post


Link to post

I think it is useful to organize everyone involved so they know their place in the relationship. It is not disrespectful at all. It is VERY respectful.

Share this post


Link to post

To quote my poly friend, it's not that anyone is less important. It's that there are only so many hours in a day and having shared expectations helps prevent conflicts.

Share this post


Link to post

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

    • By couplers
      Hi this is Petra, member of a three-woman, two-guy closed poly family. I am a long-time member of the Swingersboard, so if you want more background, you can look at previous posts. We are all now in our thirties and have found that while it used to be that the two guys could adequately take care of us three women, that is shifting. The guys have slacked off a little, while the women's desire for sex has increased. While it helps that we girls are bisexual and can help each other, we also seem to need (or at least want) more frequent sex with the guys. Penis-in-vagina intercourse is what we girls want, and the three of us women cum relatively easily, so a quick screw is satisfying.
       
      Anyone else facing a similar situation? The way we have primarily addressed this is by making one of our guys service two girls, her cumming while he holds back, then taking care of the second. Any thoughts?
    • By JW6145
      I’ve been lurking a while and read a ton here the boards. Now I’ve gotten myself into a situation that is not talked about very much on here. I’ve fallen in love with a playmate. I really didn’t mean for it to happen, and from what she tells me she didn’t mean for it to happen either. Let me start by saying I’ve been completely open and 100% honest with my wife, and my playmate Becca tells me that she has been mostly open with her husband. We’ll get to that in a bit.
       
      Becca and I met at a club, just a few months ago. From the first I thought she was attractive, I mean let’s face it, we’re here to fuck attractive people, right? My wife, Angie, and I went to the club that night to have some fun. We’re experienced swingers-we don’t play alot, swinging does not rule our lives- but we’ve had our share of fun. The night I met Becca was no different; we hoped to meet some fun people, have some good to great sex, and maybe make some friends we could hang out with on a regular basis.
       
      Becca and I both realized pretty quickly that there is a strong physical attraction between the two of us. The sex is effortless and I’ve never fit together with anyone better. After that first night of being together, my wife Angie and Becca’s husband Rob exchanged numbers. Becca asked for my number but I declined, telling her she could just text Angie if she wanted. I don’t normally like to have communication with the women I play with outside of swinging situations. I was not able to get Becca out of my head for the next several days- which is unusual for me. I threw caution to the wind sent her my number via SLS. She texted me a few hours later. Over the next several days we exchanged texts and even spoke on the phone a few times. All with Angie’s knowledge.
       
      We all four got together again a few weeks later-and it was even better than the first time. It was that night that I recognized that I had developed emotional feelings for Becca, and I was pretty sure that she had developed similar feelings for me.
       
      A few days after we were all together the second time I told my wife about my feelings for Becca. I told her I didn’t know if I was getting our sexual chemistry mixed up with emotion but I thought that could be the case. To my surprise Angie did not freak out. She told me she suspected something was up-given the amount of communication between Becca and I. I took a few weeks to sort out my feelings and spent many more hours talking to both Angie and Becca. I realized that I was probably in love with Becca. And I told them both so. Becca told me she feels the same way. This is not the “oh, I’ve just fucked someone new, I hope they like me best” kind of feeling. We’ve both been with other people since we met and it has not cooled our emotions. This is raw, real and deep.
       
      When I told Angie all of this she gave me license to pursue a relationship with Becca and follow it wherever it may lead. I did not ask for this, Angie offered it to me. Angie is secure about our commitment to each other-I am not leaving my wife and Becca and Angie both know that. Becca also has no intention of leaving her husband.
       
      Becca has talked with her husband Rob about us and the feelings we’ve developed for each other. What she has not told him is that she thinks loves me, she does not know how he would react to that (here is the mostly open part that I alluded to in the first paragraph). She has told him our feelings are deep but has not gone into how much we care for each other. Rob is completely comfortable with texts and calls throughout the day, but not with Becca and I meeting without him and Angie there-even for lunch or dinner. I completely understand and respect this. I don’t like it, but I respect it. I suspect if the shoe were on the other foot I would feel the same way. I really genuinely like Rob by the way, he treats both Becca and Angie really well-and he and Angie have really great sex together. Angie has told Rob that it’s just sex between the two of them and Rob feels the same way. They have no other feelings for each other past that.
       
      Becca and I text every day and talk several times a week; I know about her life and children, and she knows about mine. We have similar interests and lives outside of swinging, we are in similar businesses. We have become emotional rocks for each other. I get emotional needs met from her that I do not get from Angie. Again, I have been upfront with Angie about all this and she is fine with it.
       
      So here are my big questions: Do these things really ever work, or are we on the express train to Dramaville?
       
      Is it possible to keep something like this going long term?
       
      How do we navigate the fact that Rob is not comfortable with Becca and I meeting without him around (again, we will not be going against his wishes on this one) and knowing that he and Angie will want to have more variety in their swinging soon, which will leave less opportunity for Becca and I to be together?
       
      Any thoughts from the wise sages on here are welcome. I’m a big boy-if I’ve being naïve about anything please tell me. I can take it.
    • By Bluespruce1
      We have been playing with a couple for about five years on and off. We see them at our club, at some resorts and at local house parties. Wherever we are, she always seeks out my husband. We have all been together many times and I enjoy her husband very much, but for my husband and I, it’s literally just sex.
       
      She is very different with my husband lately than with her other partners. I believe she has fallen for him. When I see them together, she is very passionate and attentive to him in ways that I don’t see when she’s with other men. My husband rolls with it and is always a pleaser.
       
      We don’t want to make things uncomfortable or lose their friendship, but we are getting uncomfortable with the notion that she may be interested in a deeper relationship than we have experienced with other partners.
       
      Should we just go with it? I’m not sure I can handle sharing him that way and I don’t think he’s interested in that type of relationship either. Thoughts about when the sex leads to something more?
    • By Bluespruce1
      So we took in a very good friend about six weeks ago following a very ugly split with her ex. We have know both of them for about ten years and started playing together about three years ago. I actually have known her much longer and before we started hanging out as couples.
       
      Anyway, things have evolved to a point where we are sharing our bed 4-5 nights per week. We are playing together and separately. For example, in the morning it’s not unusual for me to come out of the shower and find her and my husband snuggling, touching and even fucking. I actually love seeing them together and have no feelings of jealousy. She and I are doing the same and actually took the day off Wednesday and simply spent the day in bed alone while he was at work. It’s not all about sex, but it’s clear that she really loves him and I think he feels the same about her. I know that I care deeply for her and may actually be in love as well.
       
      We prepare meals together, hang out in the evenings together, play together and still swing separately, but it is definitely decreasing. Everything feels very natural and relaxed and we are all content - have we found ourselves slipping into a true polyamorous relationship? I never really thought about it and we were talking about it last night.
       
      Thoughts? Warnings? This is uncharted territory.
    • By Fla-swing99
      This is the wife half asking this question. Am I correct in the definition of a poly in the fact that it means you believe you can love more than one person at the same time?
       
      If so, I am a little confused on how that can be. I guess I always felt that if you are truly in love your heart and soul is to that one person. How can you love more than one person at once and still feel that it is really love to both or either person?
       
      Please don’t take my question as a negative one, I am just very curious and would love to learn about how it works. I have only recently learned or heard about the lifestyle of polyamores, so I am intrigued and curious to learn a bit more on it. Also how then do you feel that you have met your soulmate, or do you believe there is no such thing or even possibly more than one soulmate for you?
       
      Thank you for any replies that may help me to understand this better.
×
×
  • Create New...