Jump to content

2jersey

Registered
  • Content Count

    517
  • Joined

Community Reputation

15 Good

About 2jersey

  • Rank
    Super Contributor

Personal Info

  • Relationship Status
    Couple
  • Location
    ~~~

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. We don't feel the need to publicize a resume' of each of our sexual exploitations. Once you have one or two valid certifications, you have probably met the criteria of the dubious shoppers ("yes, we are real"). But, if you have several certifications you may create the (possibly) false impression that resume' building (i.e. "bed-post-notching") is one of your primary objectives. Generally, we don't provide or accept certifications - mainly because we are already certified by some very credible people.
  2. Our age preferences are skewed (surprise!) towards younger playmates - and we believe that men age more gracefully than women. At our age 42/43, we are easily attracted to couples who are 15 years younger than ourselves (age 27ish) - but we have a narrower boundary on the upside (5 years seems about right (age 47ish). A perfect couples match for us, based on experience, is about 5 years younger (37ish). Furthermore, males at age 50+/- are perfectly fine (because men age more gracefully - check THRAX for evidence thereof) - but we have yet to encounter a 50+ woman who is sufficiently compatible (based on physical considerations). We will be surprised if we are still swinging at age 50 - give us 5 more years and we'll be happy (and probably exhausted ).
  3. 1) He can see that the girls are going to get it on 2) He wants to watch 3) You heard that he wants to watch "second hand" It is unlikely that he ever intended to "just" watch. There is a big difference between "just watching" and "watching". He expected couples play - as most people would do in this circumstance.
  4. We have met mostly extroverts, but we did encounter one female who was particularly shy. We may have misjudged her, but we interpreted her quietness as a sign that she was a reluctant participant. Deal breaker.
  5. It seems like you made the best of an awkward situation - especially given your main goal. Besides, you are perfectly well equipped to deal with the followup discussions - if any.
  6. Intensity_too - Please try to understand. You do not KNOW what people are THINKING. You may be internalizing IMAGINARY "criticisim". ? Most people understand the scientifically affirmed genetic connection to obesity - and they do not hold you accountable. We certainly don't. Relax, and be proud of yourself for making the most of a difficult situation. Best to you!
  7. Children (of any age) are not yet able to appreciate the subtle differences between swinging, on the one hand, and outright betrayal of one's marital partner (via cheating, etc...) Where children are involved, double standards are appropriate because parents have an obligation to protect. Children should be encouraged/required to be completely honest with you about their sexual relationships (if any), but parents need not to be completely forthright with the children. If this is considered "hypocrisy", so be it...
  8. Thrax - Strong enough for a man, but made for a woman.
  9. LOL_OMG, Yeah, I'm pretty adamant about the idea that the world would be a better place if people resolved conflicts with discussion (debate) rather than wars and other forms of physical violence. Personal matters, such as discussed in this thread, are a microcasm of what is going on in the world in general. People want to kill the Pope because he offended them, wars are being fought over race and religion - there doesn't seem to be enough interest in resolving issues in a peaceful manner - everyone loses, IMO. As you suggest, I can occasionally relate to the emotions which cause people to step over the line - but name calling doesn't do it for me. I've never hit anyone outside of the dojo (neither has my husband). He works for battered women's services in our county, and he is an EMT - he's seen it all and he is not a big fan of people who strike others (except in defense). As civilized beings, we also abhor racists - but what point is there in discussing racism on this board. Everyone who defends racism raise your hand. - Suddently, It got awfully quiet...
  10. Yeah, that's the problem with the AFF approach. The overwhelming majority of people answer the question - which casts suspicion on those who "prefer not to say". When we are at a soft swap stage, I used to think that size didn't matter at all. When we began to full swap, I realized I had been wrong. Beyond a certain point, small is very dissatisfying. Of course, I'm not one of those people who believe that a sex partner's pesonality stimulates orgasms.
  11. Better to pass than to try to push someone beyond their comfort zone.
  12. The first three respondents captured the essence of the term. I don't think the term is meant to be insulting - merely descriptive. Hardcore implies "avid". We have had people send us introductory messages saying they aren't hardcore. To these people, hardcore is probably not a complimentary term (judging by their eagerness to disassociate themselves with the label).
  13. “Nonviolence is a powerful and just weapon. It is a weapon unique in history, which cuts without wounding, and ennobles the man who wields it. It is a sword that heals”. - Martin Luther King, Jr.
  14. You are probably g-spot oriented, and the g-spot is not usually stimulated via oral sex. Do you masturbate? During mastubation, are you orgasmic without penetration? When you masturbate, do you lay on your stomach?
  15. Understood. If you have alot of first rate options, there is less of a need to experiment with second rate possibilities. Good for you!
×
×
  • Create New...