Jump to content

BryanKleist

Registered
  • Content Count

    3
  • Joined

Community Reputation

15 Good

About BryanKleist

  • Rank
    Just Getting Started
  • Birthday 10/01/1972

Personal Info

  • Relationship Status
    Couple/M. Female/M. Male
  • Location
    New York
  • Swinging Experience
    Five years

Swinger Info

  • SLS Name
    BryanKleist
  1. I think people make WAY too big of a deal out of this issue, on both sides. Sure it's not necessary, but there are health benefits to having it done. Sure soap and water do the trick, but there's no question it's much easier to keep a circumcised penis clean. Sure it's painful for the baby, but it certainly hurts a heck of a lot more if it needs to be done at a later age. I have a little bit of an unusual perspective on this issue, having had it both ways: I wasn't circumcised as an infant but had it done in my early 30's. It's true that the tip of the penis becomes slightly desensitized from constant exposure (rubbing against underwear, etc.) but (and this is important to specify) it is not a loss of *sexual* sensitivity, but more of a "tactile" one, if that makes any sense. All those wonderful, tingly feelings from masterbation, blowjobs, intercourse, etc. remain undiminished. Both of my sons are circumcised, although this is mainly because my wife wanted them to have that connection to her Jewish roots. If you are going to have your son circumcised, I *strongly* recommend that you not have it done at the hospital (where it's frequently performed by inexperienced interns) and opt instead for a Bris (if either of you is Jewish) or the services of a "holistic circumciser" (a Jewish Mohel who does secular snippings on the side). Circumcisions may not be brain surgery, but they *can* be botched, either removing too much skin (which can result in painful erections later on) or too little (which negates the hygienic advangtages). Most of the women I've had sex with seemed to not care one way or the other. When I was uncircumcised some of the American ones would seem a bit confused or intimidated, in which case I'd give them a quick "uncircumcised dick 101" demonstration. In general, American women have a preferance for snipped, while European women seemed to have a slight preference for unsnipped. I think women tend to like what they're used to.
  2. The most I've taken is my wife's pinky finger. It wasn't unpleasant, but it did absolutely nothing for me sexually. As a male it was interesting to experience what it feels like to be penetrated. To be truthful, it felt more like an examination than sex-play!
  3. I was born to a pair of European immigrant parents and, as a consequence, was left uncircumcised since it's never been the custom there. My wife Sue had never been with a man avec foreskin before me and was instantly fascinated by the extra skin, like she'd discovered a new toy. Ever since then she's proclaimed a preference for the "uncut version", as it has that delectable “forbidden fruit” quality for her, but it ultimately makes no difference. "A dick is a dick," she told me. "Clipped tip or not, as long as it gets up, in and off I'm happy." When our son was born I kind of wanted to leave his penis alone (just so that we'd "match" and avoid any problems with sexual identification). Sue, however, wanted to have him circumcised because of her Jewish roots (more for "tribal" reasons than religious ones). Ultimately, I had to respect her wishes and the procedure was carried out by our midwife when he was eight days old. Two months later I finally got circumcised myself; I figured that if my son wasn't going to "match" me I could still "match" him
×
×
  • Create New...