C n' D 4playin

Hey there Naughties........We enjoy your posts.......and adventures. I personally am too busy trying to walk my own moral line most days........and find i don't have the time or inclination to attempt to tell anyone else how they should behave or manage their life. It is enlightning to see how folks come across with judgments....some who i would have expected better from....when they let their true colors fly they expose a bit more of their self aggrandizing morality. I'm so pleased that they are pleased with themselves. For that......this has been an eye opening thread and a lesson about actually sharing anything of much interest at this site. I now remember once again why we don't bother to share much here.......or find much here to be very useful. We hope you continue to share and titillate......it's one of the few bright spots at the site. D

I had to sit down and calculate...my first inclination was to call it at about once a month. MY! I was off by a mile. Over the last 3 years we have been averaging about once every 6 weeks or so, if you count the exploratory suppers etc. Honest to goodness nakee sex with someone besides our spouse turns out to be about six times a year. However, I was unsure how to calculate the several multi-day long weekends in the mountains...so I weighted it the same as one encounter. We obviously are not major bed hoppers...but find that the pace is "just about right" for us. Although there are moments that we begin to think that everyone has forgotten us. This is just one facet of our very active life...and only rarely do we wish for more frequency. Besides, we are too busy screwing each other's eyes out most evenings to notice the lack of partners.

It's good to hear that a few folks still enjoy a full head of hair on a guy. NOW........for the geezer question of the week........ I am curious about opinions concerning the wisdom of coloring this aging ponytail. It has been a flattering medium dark brown for the last 20 yrs or so........but lately the hair that isn't moving from the front to the back....(or relocating to my ears, nose, or worse yet...shower drain ), has been growing in grey. My question is should i bother trying to color?....or accept the aging process with grace and wear the grey proudly? D BTW.......we have never had any issues raised about hair length ....that is one of my minor eccentricities.

no major surprises here for us.... and we concur with MB1991....curious results for the limited sample if one accepts the projected % for rationals within any population. _________________________________________________________________ D (he) Your Type is (Strength of the preferences %) INTJ Introverted 44 Intuitive 38 Thinking 12 Judging 1 moderately expressed introvert moderately expressed intuitive personality slightly expressed thinking personality slightly expressed judging personality ________________________________________________________________ C (she) Your Type is ENTJ (Strength of the preferences %) Introverted 1 Intuitive 88 Thinking 25 Judging 33 slightly expressed extrovert very expressed intuitive personality moderately expressed thinking personality moderately expressed judging personality __________________________________________________________________

As anyone who has bothered to check in on the SLS site can see...the webmasters there have decided to take the low tech approach to preventing kiddy script and some other easily filtered issues and decided to BAN all HTML tags....no paragraph breaks....no colored font...it's obvious to me, that to make our profile readable, the length will need to go back to something that looks like the "typical one line profile"...SAD SAD DAY at SLS...it is a shame that some of us were STUPID enough to have locked in with a lifetime membership. We now have NO WAY to vote with our pocketbooks...they have our money...and we now have just another lame wannabe site. I would encourage anyone that was relying on page breaks or paragraphs...or any HTML tags to make their profile stand out...you might want to go see if your profile is even readable... SLS...well on the road to catching AFF and the rest of the wannabe's at the bottom of the site barrel. there...I'm done venting!!!...just angry that they HAVE my $$$...and I am left with NO option but to shut up and suffer. The lesson here for folks that have NOT yet bothered to join SLS...THINK TWICE before you dig deep for the $$ to join...all a lifetime membership does is take away your ability to talk to the webmasters there in the ONLY fashion that they really care about...money!! I guess we will take the profile and focus on swappernet. dave edit note: if anyone links to our profile from here to see what I am referring too...for some reason the original HTML version seems to be in the link (someone has the page in buffer somewhere is suspect)...but if you actually visit the site you will see the plain text result.

LM Thank you so much for your effort, insight and opinions. We value them, and are planning to incorporate your suggestion(s) during the next overhaul. We feel that your suggestion will fit well with our goal of trying to stay positive vs having a catalog of our dislikes. BTW.... You were spot on, about the lawn, even though it snowed on it last weekend...it got mowed on Tuesday and again Friday afternoon, just before the rain. You would think that someone my age would know better than to use fertilizer as an antidote for spring fever in March. D

Since there are a couple more recent posts on this thread... We might as well just jump right in there too. (readjusting the profiles might be a worthwhile task, while the freakin' snow is melting off my freshly and unwisely fertilized lawn) be gentle but honest... C n' D SLS profile... cnd4playin

ooooooooooommmmmmmmmm!

i figure it's not quite lunch out in the central time zone..........so we all still have time to help here. a commonly shared beta brainwave throughout the whole board should do the trick....... On a three count...........1, 2, 3, ooooooooooommmmmmmmmm! D

we would shy away from the situation for all the above reasons also.......drama is one word we try to leave out of our vocabulary. we are not judging the morals of the situation......just the dynamics. the ONLY way we "might" consider the situation any differently would be for us to already know the couple......and hear from the wife in person that he was free to play on a particular evening, and even then we would have quite a bit of hesitancy.

Congratulations! Your Hotlanta Kink Test score was 500! and to think we took the test together..........and scored the same.....we HAVE been married way too long

32 years........but due for limited parole hearing in two weeks.....

I can only speak from our experience...... Our profile would fit your scenario: we do not have ANYONE blocked (as a group).....we reserve that for various and sundry morons as they appear over the horizon. We DO mention in there that we "sometimes" have an interest in a single male.....(we even used red font in hopes of having it noticed) We feel that it is amply clear .....with very little ambiguity about who would contact who. (there is even a 2nd paragraph further in the profile addressing the issue again........ for those that would / could read) Your implication that because couples sometimes chose NOT to use "mechanical methods of blocking"... "WE", therefore, are in someway or the other sending a "mixed message" to the poor befuddled single males is ludicrous. The message is "mixed" only if he is illiterate or never bothered to read to see if there might be some basis for attraction. To try to justify unwanted correspondence as the fault of the profile is pretty lame. However...either way...what we have found with this text is a filter that works, for us, to some degree. We have little interest in ANY partner(s) single or couples that can not read or comprehend. We feel those are the first steps to communication, which is important to us in the choice of partners. It does not stop the mail....but it sure makes the delete button an easier judgment. We, however, are quite sure that somewhere out there...at this very moment... is some single guy.....pissing and moaning about "couples that say they enjoy single guys"...but delete HIS mail. OH!......the speciousness of the situation! We believe that the few who do read our profile....and respond with some forethought and consideration of what was written find us quite open to discussion. Those that can't....fall into the "other" category...which BTW seems to be about 98% of the worlds population. Your "mixed messages" excuse is nothing but that... excuses.

we are still on the first... 32 years as of march 18th..... we only have one simple rule between us.......the 5 yr rule. it goes something like this. "things" (behaviors or honey do list items)....that WON'T matter in 5 years from today...we accept/ignore in eachother the "things" that WILL matter........we make sure we fix before we go to sleep tonight. *wonders why "she" seems to win all those* as Nymph an' Satyr stated....."Communication- the thing that makes swinging work is what makes marriage work too" we must be lucky......because we have always have had that ability between us....from that first date forward.