Jump to content

PaulKing

Registered
  • Content Count

    351
  • Joined

Community Reputation

18 Good

About PaulKing

  • Rank
    Swingers Board Addict

Personal Info

  • Relationship Status
    Single Male
  • Location
    LA

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. "What many don't realize is that the protein in latex that causes the sensitivity is also present in many fruits such as bananas. Unless you walk around wearing a condom 24/7, condoms are not likely to be your greatest source of latex. " Latex proteins are only one of a great many problems with latex. These include 41 toxins, 3 carcinogens, 2 suspected carcinogens and at least one known teratogen. Latex condoms have more toxic agents then any other product used internally by a substantial factor. CONDOM INDUSTRY QUOTES "...... new concerns are arising regarding allergic or other toxic reactions to various components of latex condoms such as vulcanization accelerators, latex proteins, spermicides and finishing powders." "* Studies are needed to evaluate the best lubricants to use in the manufacture of condoms. Evidence suggests that the right quantity, type and placement of lubricant is important for condom functionality, acceptability and safety. In addition, the added value and risk presented by spermicidal lubricants and by dry finishing powders (e.g. talc or cornstarch) should be critically examined." "Since the late 1980s the reported incidence of allergy to natural rubber latex has increased dramatically, as much as 12 -fold." "Latex allergy is incurable, although the symptoms, such as itching, soreness, painful blistering, runny noses, swollen eyes, asthma symptoms and anaphylaxis can be ameliorated. Everyone who has contact wi th natural rubber latex is potentially at risk from sensitisation. Both patients and health care workers can be at risk from allergic reactions to natural rubber latex. Over the past decade, allergic reactions to natural rubber latex have become a major public health concern." " Once a person has developed latex allergy, however mild, they are “sensitised” to latex and are at risk from severe allergic reactions." "Delayed cell-mediated reactions are the most common form of hypersensitivity reaction to natural rubber latex. These reactions are to individual chemical residues from the production process such as accelerants used in the vulcanization process which is required to strengthen the product. The residual chemicals may blot on the surface of the products and can be absorbed through the skin upon contact." Condoms contain compounds known to cause cancer and serious birth defects in substantial quantities SOURCE. Condom Industry web site and Beacon Pharmaceuticals, July 2001 Hope this information helps. Very best wishes, Paul
  2. Great post John. Really great! Best wishes to an old friend. Paul
  3. Dear OutofControl, If a grand total of 138 studies failed to show condoms are protection against std's I cannot imagine what would. Best wishes, Paul "The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the National Institutes of Health, released the report compiled by the panel of 28 experts, who analyzed about 138 published studies on the use of condoms during penile-vaginal intercourse. "There was a lack of evidence to help us make a definitive conclusion about the effectiveness of condoms," said panel member Dr. Timothy Schacker, an infectious disease expert at the University of Minnesota"
  4. "HIV and AIDS on the rise 3 years in a row" Completely false. Also read this: - AN ACTUARIAL ANALYSIS OF THE AIDS EPIDEMIC IN THE U.S. By Peter Plumley Presented at the 75th Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California. HIV and social/sexual clubs Another group with multiple sexual partners are the members of social/sexual clubs, commonly known as "swingers". Swingers engage in recreational sexual activity with multiple partners. In many cases, these sexual partners were strangers when the evening began. There are more than 200 swingers clubs in the U.S. and Canada, with a membership totaling perhaps 100,000, according to one magazine report. Swingers generally do not use condoms. Therefore they provide in effect a made-to-order laboratory for the study of transmission of HIV through multiple sexual partnerships and unprotected sex. If in fact the swinging lifestyle did present an "increased risk" of HIV infection, by now there would have been many cases of HIV and AIDS among the various swing clubs (or, more likely, the clubs would have closed up because of the unacceptability of the high risk). However, there has been only one reported episode of HIV infection among members of a swingers club. It involved anal rather than vaginal sex, and was reported by the CDC. In this instance, which occurred in 1986, all of the members of a swingers club were tested, and two female members were found to be HIV-positive. Both had engaged in repeated anal intercourse with two bisexual men whose HIV status could not be determined. As will be seen later in this paper, receptive anal intercourse appears to involve much higher risk levels than penile-vaginal sex. Presumably they became infected from the anal sex, rather than from vaginal sexual activity. They did not infect any of their male sexual partners, even though their HIV status was not detected until some time after their infection occurred, during which time they continued their sexual activity with various other partners. A recent article in Penthouse magazine titled "Swinging Swings Back" described the resurgence of swinging. As might be expected, the article included some "hand wringing" about the risks of AIDS being taken by these people, including a quote from a representative of the CDC that swingers were "just whistling past the graveyard". Yet the facts are to the contrary. Robert McGinley, President of the North American Swing Club Association, is quoted in the Penthouse article as stating categorically that "as far as we can tell, no person has ever contracted AIDS through heterosexual [i.e., penile-vaginal] swinging in North America". His statement appears to be correct. This author has been unable to find any data which contradicts his statement or suggests anything to the contrary.
  5. The concept is fine but unfortunately it has now been proven beyond the slightest possibility of a doubt that condoms are NO protection and pose a very considerable and serious health risk.
  6. Always natural "bareback" sex. Reason: - See thread "FDA is considering (at long last) banning latex condoms" I believe in safe sex which is very clearly latex condom free sex.
  7. Quite correct. I used Senate as some Americans don't know the other term. She was banned from visiting America which I think was shocking.
  8. Great post. If AIDS was really an std then everyone in the Rock, Swinging and Porn Industry would be long gone. Lifestyles reports that in twenty years there has never been one case of 'AIDS' in their 100,000 membership. Not one. Makes you think. Thanks again for an outstanding post. Best wishes, Paul
  9. Behind the Green Door. No contest in my opinion. I also like the Italian movies by Chiccholina (who was later elected to the Italian Senate).
  10. "That said, though the risks associated with unprotected sex can be high -- they are statistically no higher than driving your car or smoking and they are lower than some extreme sports" So true. Well said. As Michael Fumento said: - Author Michael Fumento, in his book The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS, offers substantial evidence that white, middle-class, non-IV drug abuser heterosexuals are in less danger of contracting AIDS thru non-anal, sexual intercourse than they are of dying from shark attacks, being hit by lightning, or accidentally drowning in the bathtub. The book is very well referenced and documented. The book was reviewed by the Journal of the American Medical Assn as "the best single source available to enable heterosexual persons to assess their personal risk." Very best wishes, Paul
  11. To me these kind of things are not choices. It is not a matter of which is better, but what mood you are in. Quantity can be fun and good for the ego but quality is quality. Swinging is about new and varied experiences and so by definition is diverse.
  12. I will stop 'swinging' at 55 unless they hang me. (nearly happened when I foolishly attacked someone's spelling on this board). Paul
×
×
  • Create New...