Ladies: Would you have sex with a younger, inexperienced guy

[boitoy]

After following the "Would You Pay For Sex With A Virgin?" thread, and thinking over this topic myself, I pose to you this question: Would you have sex with a younger, inexperienced guy (at no cost)?

As a younger guy with a predilection for older, mature women, I find this question very interesting. Would you actually enjoy the sex and the company of being with a younger guy, or would it simply be something you'd do as a sort of "gift," an opportunity to make someone's day (or week/month/year/lifetime!) and find joy in the pleasure you are giving that young man?

Discuss!

[mrs good times]

18-21 Hell No.
22-25 Maybe
30+ Now were talking.

While it might be an ego boost for a 40 yr old to turn on young man I prefer more experience when sex is involved.

[BD2]

Although I agree with Mrs. Good Times regarding the age assessment, I would have to consider that fact that younger men recover quicker, making for a very long fun night!

Being now in our mid-forties, experience is definitnely a plus, but I can't say that I don't miss the added joy of quick recovery!


Mrs. BD2

[boitoy]

160 something views, and only 2 replies?

C'mon ladies, cast your opinion!

[Roxysbayou]

I think that I gave my opinion in the other thread to, but I need some experience. I tend to be a hard woman to please so I need someone that knows what they are doing to make it worth it.

And I really don't find that I am attracted to younger guys. I am looking more around the 30-40 range these days. That's just me. I have more in common with that age group.

But, there were probably times in my life when I would have considered a mercy f@#K. LOL. That kind of turns me on in a way. I guess the dominance, who knows.

But 18-21, that's just to young for me.

Roxy

[yawanna]

I'm not in this to help any single young guy along in his sexual proclivity or learning curve.

No there is no enticement for me to be with a younger inexperienced male.

In fact..the older, the better. They've been around or married and/or swinging and have much more to offer than some young guy offering himself up as a male virgin. *yawn*.

If you can't get with your own age group and learn for yourself through trial and error, as most of us did, why should _I_ ?

And yea.... you'll get a lot of views and few responses because.. dang it all..some people just don't' care to respond.

[fun_pairTX]

Mrs Fun advises she doesn't go under 30...................

[Brit_Pair]

Originally posted by fun_pairTX
Mrs Fun advises she doesn't go under 30...................

Years, inches or MPH?

[fun_pairTX]

Brit_Pair it must be 30 years, she is too short for 30 inches and NOBODY in Texas ever drives under 60mph (100km to y'all).

[hmr]

What is the best way to phrase this?...

I did not enter the lifestyle to become anyone's teacher, nor do I have any inclination to start now. I prefer older men who are mature and sexually experienced to a novice. 38 to 55 seems to be a good range.

As BD2 stated, younger men do have a quicker recovery but what good is that if they don't know what they are doing? As mrs good times stated it could be an ego boost for some. For me, the propositions I get from these youngsters is enough to boost my ego.

So I guess I could say no, I would not have sex with a younger inexperienced man just to make his day, lifetime, or whatever.

Anyone under the age of 30 sort of gives me the heebie jeebies anyway. Sort of like screwing around with my brother.

mrs hmr

[fantazielvr]

While experience is defintely my first choice, being able to teach a young 'un the ways of seducing and sexxing up a woman could be fun. The ladies that the man is with later on would definitely benefit from the ministerings of an older woman. Younger than 25 though would be too creepy - like sexxing one of my kids.