Are there positions you just can't do?

[dodgechevy]

Her legs are a little too long for us to do doggy so we always had a hard time doing it. We did accidentally find a super easy way to do it in. Whatever that thing is that holds up the box spring broke. So they next time we tried to do doggy we were just able to do it as long as I was standing next to the bed and she was on the bed. So now we have our bed on the floor.

[ncmd_couple]

Can someone recommend a good ceiling fan repair technician?

But seriously, I can't think of any position that hasn't worked for us yet, but then, we haven't gone through the book and said, "honey, want to try this one?" I accept that the action on me is going to stop when I get her humming in a 69, we just pick up the play after she has had a good "O"

S

[K&JIntimates]

Have to agree with 69 thing. I prefer concentrating on what I'm doing or receiving. We can do it but we don't do it often because it's hard for me to climax in the more traditional 69 positions.

I can't do 'legs on his shoulders up over my head' position. Not only am I not flexible enough to accommodate this without a distracting discomfort in my legs, it hurts when K is thrusting.

[Thrax]

Since I'm of average length in the erection department there are some seated positions -- her facing away and depending on the angle of the chair -- that just don't work.

But, in that case, we find a different chair, or move to a different position.

There is one position though, that could cause me pain if not injury. I don't know if there is a name for it, but think of intercourse in the cowgirl position (guy flat on his back, she's sitting on top facing him). Now, still straddling him, she decides to lay back, resting her back on his legs.

For me, when my admittedly average unit is fully erect, having a woman do that is PAINFUL (as I stated in another thread). Any potential boneration below that 90 degree angle from belly to perpendicular gets into dangerous ligament-stretching territory for me.

Several couples and years ago I was in the cowgirl position with a new play partner and she unexpectedly said, "Trust me!," and lay back like that. Luckily I had my wits about me and sat up fast. Phew! I figured out later that her hubby's unit, which is comparable to some livestock appendages, definitely gets bigger but does not get nearly as solid as my boner. So his full erection is definitely much bigger than mine, but I might have the upper hand, so to speak, with regard to stiffness. So that was most likely my problem in that case.

In pornos, I've seen that guys with a larger-than-average units, or average and not fully-erect penises, apparently comfortably assume that position. However, unless a visit to the ER (and a LOT of embarrassing questions) is your turn-on, then, with me, that position is a no-no.

Let's try something else, shall we? Just let me know in advance if you're going to do something suddenly. Please. Thanks.

Thrax

[J&D]

When we were first married we did 69 as part of foreplay not really trying to make either cum. I (male) found that I had a problem being comfortable on the bottom. Found out that I was clasphrobic (SP) which made it hard to concentrate.

Found doggy style was a little hard to do until I stand on exercise steps and it works great.

When we were younger cowgirl was our favorite because we could also do it in the car.

[SecretAsianMan]

About two thirds of the positions in the Kama Sutra book are just not designed for me to comfortably get into... sometimes it's simply a lack of endowment on my part ('cuz lets face it - some of those positions REALLY require a fella to be hung like a donkey to accomplish) ... and some of them are due to my own / my partners lack of bendy-ness

[Tia Vampire]

Having my partner jump from across the room and into my pussy would be hard for us to do. By the way, I love NCfuncouple98's avatar. Anything in a standing position is hard for us to do because i'm so short.

[NCfuncouple98]

Originally Posted by Tia Vampire

By the way, I love NCfuncouple98's avatar. Anything in a standing position is hard for us to do because i'm so short.

Thank you! We too have the same issue. Mr. NC is 6'3", Mrs. is 5'1"(and a 1/2"). LOL. Standing positions would never work for us!

[rpu3]

I've yet to been able to pull off a standing position with anyone. I'm 5'7" (agghhh! I'm shrinking in my old age!), and everyone I've been with is at least my height or taller (up to 6'7") and it's just never worked out. The last thing left to try is leaving a tall pair of heels on with a 5'11"-6' partner, I guess. Maybe I'm supposed to try it with men shorter than I am?

[Cpl2share]

We love 69! Of course, Mrs Cpl loves the tongue, and that is really the only way for her to get off. I do not need to get off that way, so I enjoy giving it to her and she keeps me interested. I always know when I hear and feel it pop out of her mouth that the squirming is about to begin and I have done my job well. Doggy and any of the "deep penetration" positions are pretty much out for us as I am on the longer side and she is definately on the "shallow" side. Bottom line is that as long as we are both getting wet it is not just good it is greeeaaaat.

[SW_PA_Couple]

One of the delightful discoveries of having multiple sex partners is what does not work with one woman works just fine with another. I experience the difficulty that Thrax described but recently had a woman sit on top of me whose vaginal opening was located more anterior than usual. Worked just fine. Another woman of my acquaintance has her hole so far forward that I was able to enter her while we were both standing. I had absolutely despaired of this ever being possible.

The 69 position and the act are no trouble for me but I have yet to meet a woman who will allow it to go to "completion". Reading the posts in this thread have been enlightening.

All of this has reminded me of something a sex-education teacher told me (state-mandated sex education in a private religious-based high school is something frightening). He said that a man and woman had to reach a "climax" at exactly the same time or a baby would not happen. How about that for difficult? Too bad this is not true. It would certainly solve any problem of overpopulation.

~Michael

[LFM2]

Originally Posted by SW_PA_Couple

One of the delightful discoveries of having multiple sex partners is what does not work with one woman works just fine with another.

This is exactly a great thing to bring up. One of Dave's partners loves 69, her brain isn't wired so weird that she could enjoy both the act of giving and receiving. This is what we love about variety. It allows us something different to try with a partner that our own partner really can't do.

Originally Posted by SW_PA_Couple

All of this has reminded me of something a sex-education teacher told me (state-mandated sex education in a private religious-based high school is something frightening). He said that a man and woman had to reach a "climax" at exactly the same time or a baby would not happen. How about that for difficult? Too bad this is not true. It would certainly solve any problem of overpopulation.

~Michael

Just the thought of a religious based teaching is frightening. (8 years of parochial school here) Whoda thunk that they would teach something that ridiculous. Or else, maybe he truly believed it. That would mean all those poor women who can't climax would be barren.

[vanillaknot]

For me, 69 is one of those "really comfortable, very settled into it, could stay there for hours" kinds of things. It's arguably the most relaxing position as there's not a lot of movement needed. When the other person gets too stimulated to keep attention on what they're doing, I figure that's a good thing, it means I'm doing something right, sometimes really really right.

Maybe best of all, the fact that someone cums doesn't necessarily mean that anything has to stop or move or change, which is a big reason for the "could stay there for hours" perspective.

[celtic239]

The male standing up and holding the wife upside down doing 69 is a bit daunting. However I'm intruiged with the posts by some of the females stating that they don't like simultaneous 69, as it breaks the concentration of the orgasm. Does the same brain block occur during threesomes/group sex?

[fun4Ds]

Originally Posted by celtic239

The male standing up and holding the wife upside down doing 69 is a bit daunting. However I'm intruiged with the posts by some of the females stating that they don't like simultaneous 69, as it breaks the concentration of the orgasm. Does the same brain block occur during threesomes/group sex?

Maybe you should start a new thread, thats a good question