Guys with smaller dicks and anal sex

[Chicup]

Originally Posted by JustAskJulie

Has anyone else noticed that it seems like guys with smaller dicks seem to prefer anal sex? Is it related to their being able to get more friction?

I think this is indeed a trend.

I'm not sure if its a more friction thing or an ego thing though. My girth makes anal sex not that fun for me, and less fun for any partners, my thoughts about men with less than average size is that they can do something "different" to women that I just can't do.

As a personal aside the only female of a couple where their profile mentioned how much she likes anal sex (that we played with), it turned out that the male was no bigger than an index finger.

[herpob]

Originally Posted by JustAskJulie

I guess it depends on the lady. A good friend of mine once took a dick that I felt was too big to put anywhere and put it in her ass. I swear this guy was as big around as my forearm and almost as long.


Then again, I guess this begs the question if you see a profile where the guy is "into anal" can you almost assume from that that he is smaller than average?

Like I keep saying - you HAVE to work at it! Great sex is NOT for the lazy! To handle anal from anyone I have to clean well, work at it, build up to it, stretch, and then I cen pretty much handle anything within reason (no monsters).

Great things come to those who work hard!!!

[bryanlee]

I am sort of neutral in this area. I fall in the above average size, but i can enjoy anal if the female enjoys it. I don't want to have to wonder if she is in pain or not enjoying herself. I have been with women who have had amazing orgasms during anal and some who would rather have their foot in a bear trap.

I can see how a woman might rather have anal sex with a man who was smaller especially if she is new to anal.

I think some guys are so into it just because it tends to be very taboo among some women.

Anal "size queens" come in both sexes. Try looking at the toys where gay guys shop!

Based on what some guys do, one could even argue that (given time, stretching, etc.) there are dicks which a woman can only take anally. Counter argument is a 10 cm (4") birth canal, which does take a lot of work to achieve...

My fantasy partner generally wants to at the edge of pain and pleasure, a touch of pain backing off into increased pleasure, the pain/pleasure line advancing slightly, and the next touch of pain a wee bit farther out. This, plus traditional male programming, has always had my subconscious saying "need bigger cock".

Several past lovers have sincerely complemented me as "small enough to fit anywhere and big enough to touch all the right spots".

Given that I'm +/- 1/4" (.63 cm) of average length and average girth, it seems that average works great. Or, most men (2/3 or 1sd are within 3/4" 2cm of the average) should have not problem with anal sex with most women.

So I suggest that it's the women who as gateway allowing more "smaller" men as anal lovers, which leads to "smaller" men being able to say they've experienced anal sex. From a purely sensation point of view, all men should enjoy anal the same. Put these two statements together and we hear "smaller" men enjoying anal sex because "smaller" men get more of it, i.e. are allowed anal by women.

In other words, "larger" men would express the same preferences as the "smaller" men if they were getting anal, which they aren't because of size considerations. (Or so my theory says...)



As far as the friction goes, they experience is different in many ways, not just in the amount of friction. Friction intensity reduces after a while as muscles relax, and for a couple of my lovers who did Kegles, it ended up similar to what they offered during PIV.

Personally, my preference is finishing with anal (after PIV) about half the time. The "finishing" comes from always taking a break to clean up, so after I return the next go around can be PIV again.

[Chicup]

Originally Posted by rdy46227

In other words, "larger" men would express the same preferences as the "smaller" men if they were getting anal, which they aren't because of size considerations. (Or so my theory says...)

Maybe but anal is not my first choice, so for me at least this wouldn't hold true. All things being equal, or at least not painful, we have have one hole thats evolved for my penis, and one thats designed for expelling shit. My choice is clear

[des1re06]

We have one male friend that loves anal, and talks about it alot. Really a turn-off for me. I once stopped him mid-story and told him that I'd never be interested unless he was the size of my pinkie. He jumped up and said, "Well, let's go." I wasn't giving an invitation, but apparently he is that small (I had no clue).

It's just not my cup of tea, but I have no problem with hubby participating in DP, if that's what the lady wants (with protection and care).

Mrs. D

[Trace Ekies]

I am average in all dimensions where my penis is concerned and I love anal and vaginal sex equally.

My enjoyment of anal sex has nothing to do with the tighter fit although it is tight. It has to do with enjoying the sensations of having sex with a woman who enjoys anal sex. On the flip side, I do not want to have anal sex with a woman who doesn't like having her butt fucked. Everyone enjoying themselves is the key.

Besides, the difference in the feel from a woman's vagina to her backside is like night and day and I for one love the feel of both.

Gimme, gimme, gimme...

Trace

[BiMale4FunLV]

My equipment is an average 6in long and as thick as a half-dollar. I would rather have anal sex (a good "butt fuck", as Trace Ekies says) than an 18-year-old virgin girl any day. Its a completely different feeling than vaginal and oral. A tube versus a hole I guess. But more importantly about anal is that its more of a challenge, making it much more desirable.