Boob Job - Ladies opinions

[SuAndBud]

Su adores it when Bud's penis is between her boobs and she pushes them up in order to try to improve the feeling for him. Su is always wondering whether to have her 32A/B's silicone enhanced to improve their size for this (as well as to show them off more).

But Bud can't understand what's in it for the female? Su says she truly loves it and gets a tingle between her legs, but Bud sometimes feels selfish and thinks she's doing it for his pleasure, only.

Only one girl in Bud's experiences has ever flatly refused to perform a boob job stating "you're being selfish". Bud only spent that one night with her because it just all seemed to go downhill from there.

How do other ladies feel?

[havefuninsun]

I LOVE knowing that I turn Mr. Fun on -- and if pleasuring him with a boob job turns him on, it gives me the tingle between my legs ... I'd bet Su feels the same way.

As for silicone -- I find all breast sizes beautiful. The smaller ones have the advantage of being perky -- more perky than the large ones. And I've seen some very sexy clothes warn on women of small bra sizes ... and I think "I wish I could pull that off" (I'm not large, but large enough that some sagging is goin' on ) -- small breasts without a bra -- yummy yummy stuff.

And there's prolly one reason Bud isn't with the girl who didn't want to play boob job with him...sounds like SHE was the selfish one!

(and Su -- don't you find it erotic as hell to push up your boobs and watch as his cock slides closer to your face? Big turn on!!!)

[ohash01]

There are a lot of cons to getting a boob job (the implant kind...not the penis-interaction kind...there are NO cons with that...haha.) and it's my opinion that unless those bad boys are giving you back problems or you get a clogged mammary gland or cancer or something...no surgery needed. They've gotten MUCH safer in recent years, but still aren't 100% safe.

I am a little on the larger scale (very full C - I just can't bring myself to upgrade to a D, even though I bet I'd be popping out less...) and it's not all it's cracked up to be. Sure, they're sexy...but they're heavy! And I'm 23 and they're already getting a little droopy. Woe is me!

But I have to agree. It is VERY sexy to see a penis coming through the valley my breasts make. It's the only time you really get to SEE it going in and out. With any other form of sex (oral, anal, vaginal) it kinda disappears. Nice change in my opinion!

And don't worry about being selfish Bud!! If Su didn't like it, I'm SURE she'd tell you. Plus, I bet there's one thing she really likes to have done that may not do that much for you, but the fact that you're turning her on is a turn on.

[Amanda69]

Being a full DD I would say don't do it....I would love to have a pair of little B's or even an A at this point. I could wear all those wonderful tops out their on the market and not worry about a bra.

Sore kneck, shoulders, swelling at that time of the month, heading rapidly south...yup give me smaller anyday.....

I have also checked out a few friends boob jobs, I just did not like the feeling.

[ShellyM]

Its completely up to her. I would not go too large, especially if she has a small frame, because large breasts look ridiculous on really petite women. And please, research your plastic surgeon!!! Nothing looks worse than a boob job gone bad, with the rippling thing that can happen. Other than that, its up to Su.

[SuAndBud]

Bud doesn't want all the girls here to think "Oh my, aren't you wonderful" (already looking for the sick-bag) but Bud just wants Su to have what she wants and can't help wondering, too, if Su having a boob job might be fun for him and more confidence building for her (why she needs confidence boosting when she could easily have a little black book as thick as a telephone directory?!).

Su has the most perfect, small but pert breasts imaginable. perfect shape, firm and pointing skywards.Why she wants to change them is anyone's guess, but she has had a couple of friends who have recently been enhanced and maybe feels like she's missing out on something.

Bud can't help but be aroused at the thought of Su with bigger tits but is worried about the negatives.

So Bud's gonna try to talk her out of it.

But, Bud's main purpose of the thread, which he clouded himself by his ambiguity of "Boob Jobs" and his referral to silicone enhancement is: Do girls really get off on being fkd between the boobs as much as the guy does?

[daisy girl]

Small breasted woman here...I only wear a bra when going to work...and I love being free. Unfortunately, I can't do the boob thing. But...Bordeaux (a.k.a. daisy boy) doesn't mind that i am a "little" woman.

[sexyshelby]

Originally Posted by SuAndBud

But, Bud's main purpose of the thread, which he clouded himself by his ambiguity of "Boob Jobs" and his referral to silicone enhancement is: Do girls really get off on being fkd between the boobs as much as the guy does?

I don't. Personally, I don't like it at all. It doesn't feel good and can even hurt sometimes.

~SS

[Pepper & Drew]

Originally Posted by SuAndBud

But, Bud's main purpose of the thread, which he clouded himself by his ambiguity of "Boob Jobs" and his referral to silicone enhancement is: Do girls really get off on being fkd between the boobs as much as the guy does?

It doesn't do a thing for me, and I've never really gotten it. But, to each his own....or should I say "her" own.

As for the boob job, I say if you want it, and you've got the money: do it! I haven't regretted getting mine at all. Well, maybe about day 4 post op I did, but not since then

Pepper

[Spoomonkey]

I have known women who have initiated this and expressed enjoyment in it.

That's good enough for me

Spoomonkey

[Amanda69]

Do girls really get off on being fkd between the boobs as much as the guy does?

No doesn't do a thing for me either.

[SuAndBud]

OK, Su seems pretty determined to have her boobs made a little bigger, so anyone offer some ideas of whether to go for silicone or saline?

We both agree that insertion via the armpit sounds best as less noticeable scarring (especially as Su's skin is not white), but would anyone disagree?

Guess it's over to you, Pepper or A.N.Other who's had the op.

[blinkey]

Originally Posted by SuAndBud

OK, Su seems pretty determined to have her boobs made a little bigger, so anyone offer some ideas of whether to go for silicone or saline?

Mrs. Blinkey recently had this work done, and went with saline. The results have been extremely good. A little advice: research your surgeon, as has been said before, a bad boobjob can be painful, embarassing, reduce self-esteem or even cause depression. Look at the doctor's results, ask for recomendations, and read as much as you can online. Don't go for the bargain-basement doctor, because you will get what you pay for.

We decided to go with saline because it is more flexible. Our opinion why: silicone are pre-built and are full-size before the cut is even made. Thus, they require larger cuts in order to insert them and have larger scars too. They cannot be custom-shaped, they look more "round" and less natural (our opinion) than saline, and you get exactly how the machine made them. With saline, they can insert them empty and fill them with fluid after they are positioned inside... with much smaller scars as a result. They also can adjust the amount of saline to customize the breast size, since most women's breasts are slightly different sizes. There are some non-round saline implants too, known as the "profile" look, which for larger implants have less width to them. (That's what we did.) It helps prevent the appearance of being overweight by not sticking out on the sides. "Big boobs" do have the danger of making her look heavy, especially if not done well.

Also, we went under the muscle for a few reasons. They look more natural, they feel more real, and the implant does not get in the way of breast exams. Going over the muscle may heal a little faster, but if it develops, may also hide the early signs of breast cancer, which is obviously very important to detect.

Just our $0.02. Good luck.

[Pepper & Drew]

I respectfully disagree with just about everything you said.

Originally Posted by blinkey

We decided to go with saline because it is more flexible. Our opinion why: silicone are pre-built and are full-size before the cut is even made. Thus, they require larger cuts in order to insert them and have larger scars too. They cannot be custom-shaped, they look more "round" and less natural (our opinion) than saline, and you get exactly how the machine made them.

True, silicone is pre-filled and generally has a larger scar (but, we're talking a half inch...not a great deal larger, but it depends on the skill of the surgeon) and saline is better if there are differences in size symmetry that you want to fix with surgery. But, silicone does not look more round (depending on the manufacturer, the dimensions are almost identical to saline) and actually feels more like natural breast tissue than any other fill-type. Think about it: fill a plastic bag with water, then fill one with hair gel. Which one feels more like the natural breast? Silicone is used almost exclusively in Europe, Asia, Canada and Central and South America.

Silicone is not been approved for general use by the FDA in the US, so in order to get silicone in this country on your initial BA, you must go to a PS that is participating in one of the three cohesive gel silicone studies, by Inamed, Mentor, or Silimed, and you have to participate in the study, which means you have yearly follow-ups, questionaires (which I call crazy checks, because they're questions to see if you're a nut-job or not). Otherwise, saline is your only option. Saline, by the way, has a higher rupture rate, and a higher ripple rate, which is the phenomenon of seeing the waves or ridges on the side of the implant.

There are some non-round saline implants too, known as the "profile" look, which for larger implants have less width to them. (That's what we did.) It helps prevent the appearance of being overweight by not sticking out on the sides. "Big boobs" do have the danger of making her look heavy, especially if not done well.

That's partially right. There are 4 different implant profiles. Low profiles are wide and don't have much projection: think pancake. Moderate profiles have moderate width and moderate projection. Moderate plus is narrower than mods, but have slightly more projection (they stick out more). Then, there's high profiles that are not wide at all, but have more projection. They were designed so that women with small ribcages could acheive more size and not have breasts that were wider than their ribcage.

Shape of the implant is different than the profile, and you can get either shape in any of the projection types. There are rounds and there are anatomicals, or teardrop. Anatomicals are shaped more like the natural breast. The downside with those are that if the PS does not cut the pocket correctly, the implant may flip inside the pocket. Not good.

Also, we went under the muscle for a few reasons. They look more natural, they feel more real, and the implant does not get in the way of breast exams. Going over the muscle may heal a little faster, but if it develops, may also hide the early signs of breast cancer, which is obviously very important to detect.

Unders don't necessarily look more natural. Again, it depends on the fill type, the choice of implant dimension, how much natural breast tissue the patient has, thickness of the patient's skin and whether they get smooth or textured implants. I have overs, and they're quite natural and you can't really feel the implant at all. I also had lots of natural breast tissue, have silicone and thick skin. Unders have the possibility of muscle distortion, which means any time you move your pec muscles, the implant jumps or distort in some way. Doesn't happen to all, but is a possibility. One placement is not better than another for every person. A good PS will help to determine what's best for you. This is certainly not a one-placement-fits-all kinda thing.

As far as mammograms are concerned, unders also obscure mammograms. The difference is that mammograms with overs have a 12 - 15% less detection rate than unders. But, with self breast exams, overs and unders have equal detection rates, and women who are diagnosed with breast cancer who have either overs or unders have identical survival rates. Survival is the important thing when it comes to breast cancer.

I could go on and on about boobs, but I won't . Hope that helps!

Pepper

[SW_PA_Couple]

Originally Posted by Amanda69

Being a full DD I would say don't do it....I would love to have a pair of little B's or even an A at this point.

I had breast reduction eighteen years ago. One of the best moves I ever made. No more backaches, no more appointments at a specialty corset shop, no more lurid leers while out in public. Having a man stick his schwanz between by boobs never did much for me.

Just my two cents.

JoAnn