| Press CTRL-D to Bookmark This Site | ||||
TM |
| |||
| |||||||
| General Swingers Stuff Forum for all things swinger related. If it doesn't fit in one of the other swinger related forums, then post it here. |
|
| | LinkBack (1) | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |
#1 (permalink)
|
| Here to Stay Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 22 Location: Sheffield Status: Couple
|
I have been exploring this lifestyle for sometime now (over 10 years) and have often found people are willing to rush into things rather quickly, for example some singles / couples will be wanting sex on the first meet, or even the second, which often leads into rushed, nervous and unsure encounters and creates further problems down the line, so wouldn’t it prove better, safer and more logical to get to know them better as friends first? In my experience it has, and think a lot people rush into the sexual side of things and virtually forget about the friendship and social side. So what are your thoughts? How many social meets do you like to have? Is it better to get to know people more as friends first? Do you think people should have more social meetings? Do you think more social meetings would make things go smoother? Spiritual x |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Julie's Helper Join Date: Jul 2001 Posts: 5,003 Location: baker, fl, usa Status: couple Swing Lifestyle Name:tblonde312
|
I think it all depends on what it is you're wanting to get out of swinging. If you're a couple/single that is wanting to make friends first before playing, then I suppose getting to know them better and having more social meetings before you play would/could make things go smoother. If you're a couple/single who is into swinging to have sex, then what's the point of taking it slow and making friends first? It's been our experience that you can "friend" yourself out of a good sexual encounter. For us, we're in swinging to have sex with others. Friendship is optional. It's great when it happens, but it's not necessary. We've made numerous life-long friends through swinging; some, we still have sex with, others we don't. We've had sex on the first meet and no problems arose. All involved were on the same page in knowing that it most likely was a one-time thing and we might or might not see each other and/or play again. Considering the fact that most of our playing is done at house parties, the chance of meeting someone and having sex immediately is extremely high. Hell, we've even had sex with people we didn't know their names until after the fact. Again, it's all dependent upon what it is you want out of swinging. Friends first then play or play first and if friendship occurs great. Teresa |
|
__________________ Ted and Teresa No lifetime is enough unless you live it in such a way as to make it enough. | |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Swingers Board Addict Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 850 Location: York, PA Status: Couple - he posts/reads Swing Lifestyle Name:hereforfunrm
|
when we started swinging (about 1.5 years ago), we thought that friends first was the way to do things. That did not last long as it is alot of work to find people that you think are going to be compatible beyond the sexual attraction. We now spend some time getting to know a couple, email, chat, talking at a club or party and then if everyone is comfortable we will play on on a first meeting. For us swinging is about swapping for sex, not looking for people to hang out with. That being said, we've have made a number of good friends meeting people in this way. Sex first, pehaps friends later is the way we go. So to answer your questions specifically: How many social meets do you like to have? One Is it better to get to know people more as friends first? No Do you think people should have more social meetings? No Do you think more social meetings would make things go smoother? Not for us. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| ~This space for rent~ Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 4,750 Location: across the tracks Status: Couple
|
Teresa said it perfectly. We're not really into making friends. If it happens, it happens but it isn't a requirement. I also admit that we've had sex with people on first "dates". That just happens as well. As long as everyone is on the same page and boundaries are known. Sometimes when we get to "know" a person, the attraction is lessened and often subsides to the point that we don't want to have sex then, but remain great friends. We too swing to have hot sex with others. It's our whole objective. |
|
__________________ Dave & Holly | |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Swingers Board Addict Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 293 Location: Virginia Status: Female half of a couple Swing Lifestyle Name:prometheius
| with all the above. We dont have a lot of free time, so if we all have a sexual connection and if its there on the first meet then why postpone the fun? |
|
__________________ ~You only get out of it what you put into it~ | |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Has Left the Building Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 235 Location: utah Status: couple
|
We have some friends in the lifestyle that would make most nuns and priests seem like a bunch of wild sex maniacs and we have some other friends that are super hardcore and host parties that most pornstars would run in fear of. When you talk to each of those couples the exact same words come out of their mouths. They both talk about how selective they are and how important it is for them to be friends first and that they need to be comfortable and that they won't just jump into bed with anyone. The hardcores go to bed with probably hundreds of people a year and the squeemish couple probably have never full swapped in several years but they both say exactly the same things and they are both sincere and honest when they say it. The difference between the two is not in the content of what they need before they play, the difference is in the degree to which they need it. Both require a level of attraction, connection and comfort before they can play with someone, the difference is one couple needs 6 months of weekly dinners, card games and vacations together before they have that comfort and the hardcores need about 15 minutes of chit-chat at a party before they can play. Niether is right or wrong in their approach. both couples are great people and are very nice and respectfull. Both treat people with dignity and respect. Both couples say the sex is better if there is some kind of personal connection and friendship. Where they differ is how they acheive that level of connection. When we first started swinging we told ourselves that we would have to be "friends first" and that we would have to "get to know then" and we still feel that way. However what we consider 'friendship' and 'knowing' someone has changed a lot over time. To answer your questions as it pertaines to us specifically - #1. It may take us weeks to arrainge a first meet and God only knows how long before a second so we would prefer to play on the first meet and preferably be done before 2 in the morning. #2. that all depends on what you consider friends. If we find them attractive and we all have some kind of sexually chemistry and if we feel safe enough that they aren't ax-murders and will respect our rules and boundries then we consider them "lifestyle friends" and will play with them. #3. No. IMHO people should have LESS social meetings unless you have the time to burn and you actually enjoy the social intercourse (I'll explain that more in #4) #4. Again, NO. We have played with some people after knowing them and going out with them for a couple years and we have played with people within the hour of first meeting them and there is virtually NO DIFFERENCE in the enjoyment or the "smoothness" of the sexual experience. In fact if anything the sex is hotter and less inhibited with people you have less of a social investment with because the focus is on the sex and you aren't worried about how things will affect your friendship or what they will think of you afterwards. And I will also add that many of the complications, hurt feelings and dramas in the lifestyle do not come from the sex but rather from the emotional, personal and social complexities that come from trying to be "friends" with people and trying to have an ongoing social/personal relationship with them. Now I am not knocking frienships and we do have people we consider actual friends and if you enjoy the social pursuits then by all means knock yourself out. But IMHO sexuality and social connection are two completely different concepts and are on two different wavelengths and they are not really related to each other. The two can coexist but the reality is you can have just as good of sex with someone you have just met as long as the attraction, chemistry and comfort are there. its just that some people can do that in an hour and some people reguire a year or more. The real challenge with everyone is finding the right people that you mesh with and that is the challenge whether you are a hardcore or a lightweight. |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| A Little Of Everything Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 1,847 Location: Michigan Status: M. Female Swing Lifestyle Name:aliloeverything
|
It depends on how things progress. We prefer to go with the natural flow of things and are open to just seizing the moment. If that first night there is chemistry flowing everywhere, why wait? Sometimes the flow is a more gradual build up and that can be awesome too. I prefer to not plan too much and just roll with it. Back when we met people online we never played the first night, mostly just because that was how it progressed. I like the socials better, they set a more natural pace for us.
|
|
__________________ ~Lilo | |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Tastes Great Less Filling Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 1,467 Location: Los Angeles Status: Single Male Swing Lifestyle Name:Secret_Asian_Man
| Quote:
I like to eventually develop a friendship with these people with whom I'm having sex with ... so I like to meet up & get to know them a bit. At least one. "Better" is pretty subjective to the individual. I like getting to know some of them as friends ... but with some folk, it's just pure physical chemistry and nothing else. (Not that there's anything wrong with that) Depends on the people & what they're looking for. I love "social meetings" Not necessarily - there are plenty of folk I've met over the years which have great physical chemistry & great sex... but we're far too different in every other viewpoint & personality to be more than great fuck-buddies. If it weren't for the sex, we probably wouldn't hang out together much. | |
|
__________________ Have some... you'll want some more an hour later | ||
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Here to Stay Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 22 Location: Sheffield Status: Couple
|
Some really good comments thanks a lot, however perhaps my original point was a little to strong in some regards, for example I'm not saying get to know people as your best and most trusted friends, or even get to know them as "FRIENDS" at all, just the suggestion that getting to know them a little better may help? Like having one or two social meets rather than jumping in head first. I am fairly confident with this now and have had sex on first dates myself, but have noticed that (sometimes) it can make people nervous, especially if there not that experienced with this. I guess it does depend on you / the people in question as some will be happy to play straight away (and be confident) where others would need a little more time for comfort to build. There are obviously a lot of aspects that get in the way of this question, for example if you have spoke for ages online, or traveled miles to meet, then sure playing straight away would probably be on the cards, same goes if your at a club or house party, chances are you could easily meet someone there and play straight away, but there are also a lot of couples / singles out there who dont go to clubs, or that are looking for a longer term / more local situation, so the question of social meets can vary greatly depending on the circumstances. I personally dont mind playing on first dates or having more social meeting first, either is fine, but have noticed rushing straight into sex can sometimes spoil things or leave some people a little unprepared, nervous, shy, or lacking in confidence. Suppose for those looking for private, home or hotel based fun, that are looking for a longer term, semi friendship style approach then more social meets would be good? But for those looking for club experiences, parties, or long distance style meets, then obviously less or none. Have ended up rushing straight in myself before now, with couples and with singles alike, and sure some have gone really well but others haven’t, lads failing to get hard, girls clamming up and going quiet, people arguing, waning to stop, and so on. Could a lot of this be put down to the simple fact you dont know the people that well, which is part of my reason for asking your opinion on social meetings. It seems the standard is either no social meet (play on the first date) or just one social meet first, but is one single meet even enough time to talk, feel relaxed, get to know people ect. Im not saying sex straight away is bad (its not lol) just wondering if more time to connect with people and talk about things would cut out more nerves and possible problems later?
|
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.swingersboard.com/forums/general-swingers-stuff/47705-how-many-social-meets-do-you-have.html | ||||
| Posted By | For | Type | Date | |
| General Swingers Stuff on The Swingers Board - Powered by vBulletin | BoardReader | This thread | Refback | 03-14-2010 09:19 PM | |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Like/Dislikes about Meets | J&RNNJ | Swinging at Home/Clubs/Parties/Resorts | 8 | 06-08-2007 10:50 PM |