TM |
|
|
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, reply without moderation, communicate privately with other members (PM), upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely FREE so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. If you are simply looking for a site to place and browse personal ads then please check out one of the other great personal ads sites Listed Here |
| |||||||
| Swingers Ads | Swinger Pics | Swinger Stories | Shopping | Featured Swingers | Swingers Clubs | Swinger Advice | Dictionary | FAQs | Swinger Links |
| Forums | Blogs | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Register |
| General Swingers Stuff Forum for all things swinger related. If it doesn't fit in one of the other swinger related forums, then post it here. |
This is a discussion on Is girl on girl sex actually a full swap? within the General Swingers Stuff forums, part of the Swingers Topics category; Originally Posted by JustAskJulie So what's your opinion? If the only cross-couple sex taking place is girl/girl, ...
![]() ![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| Mmmmm...tasty! | Imagine if a couple told you they were full swap, but when you got to the room they said that they considered girl-girl swap as full swap. Yeeeeaaaaah, I don't think it would fly. Girl-girl is not full swap. Pepper
__________________ "Swinging is a lot like riding a Harley, ...for those who understand, no explanation is necessary; for those who don't, no explanation is possible." --Mr. Alura |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) | |
| Mod Squad Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Posts: 6,420 Location: Reno, Nevada Status: Married to Mrs Good Times SLS Name:randp | Quote:
![]()
__________________ R (He is R, she is P) | |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) |
| Your Hostess Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 22,307 Location: Alabama Status: Female SLS Name:swingersboard Blog Entries: 59 | I wish I had linked the thread I was reading and now I can't find it (of course). I completely agree with the idea that f/f only is definately not full swap, however in that thread several people said it was (which I thought was really odd... but then there have been many odd things said around here over the years). It's very interesting to see the difference in responses from the folks now vs 5 or 6 years ago. |
| | |
| | #21 (permalink) |
| nothin special Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 870 Location: Dallas Status: M. Male - half of a novice swinging couple SLS Name:Bruce_Melissa Blog Entries: 11 | On one hand, labels are very useful communication tools. Lawyers and scientist use a very exact language, used car salesmen use a very "relaxed" language - each derrive a benefit from that choice. Normal folks (swingers included) fall somewhere inbetween the extreemes. We need a reasonable precision in our language for efficient communication but we don't want too many terms. Each subculture establishes its own jargon of significant terms and tunes the meaning of those terms to its needs, acting as a collective. Jargon development, is a bottom-up process (get your mind out of the gutter ) New words are invented or definitions adjusted in conversations as the need arrises and get accepted by the group if the change is percieved as positive. Jargon confusion is related to the speed those language adjustments are propogated through the group and become accepted. Documents used by the group (including online forum posts) loose value by the language adjustments unless revised.This forum highlights the state of jargon confusion in the swinger's domain and serves to reduce it. The many threads about what certain terms means to us individually (like this one) propogate the consensus of the group and generally reduce confusion. The fundamental power of the internet is the globalization of our thoughts. I see a trend toward higher precision in "swingerese" and suspect that's also true among other sexual subculture groups. Our activity variations and levels of comfort outnumber the terms in common use. On the other hand, swinging is all about intercourse [is that a cool wordplay or what?]. I think most of us are unlikely to commit to an encounter based on anatomical compatability and a few buzzwords. There's a bit of a hierarchy in the decision process about you and me getting together for some play time. I guess the first hurdle is mutual physical attraction. Rules and boundaries are important to know, but I think the most significant thing is "what are we in the mood for tonight", what are our preferences. As we flirt and communicate, I might suggest an activity that I think sounds like fun or you might suggest something I would be interested in doing with you. We'll describe our preferences as they relate to the activity as we touch and get to know each other better. We both know, either one of us can terminate the encounter with a single word or redirect the activity as we mutually prefer. The exact meaning of a few buzzwords is trivial when we concentrate on each other's smiles....
__________________ Drama sold separately,,,,, some assembly required..... |
| | |
![]() ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How many people are only into girl/girl? | arvcpl | BiSexuality & Swinging | 16 | 04-09-2007 10:17 AM |
| First girl/girl experience and disappointed | 40andloveit | First Time Experiences | 24 | 09-04-2005 02:30 AM |
| Girl/Girl or Full Swap? | Ditto | Terminology | 14 | 09-06-2003 01:45 PM |