A question about bi women

[gnb4u]

Originally Posted by arvcpl

We have also seen some of gnb's #2, #5 and a lot of #6. In fact it makes me wonder if most of these women that call themselves bi could actually be called "bi for the guys"

Bi for the guys? I love it!! I gotta use that one

[lucky007]

From a very bi woman: I don't think it's a lacking from men or foreplay. To me being intimate with another woman is emotionally and physically satisfying , sweet and nurturing. (Something my husband could never give me) We are not a full swap couple. I get it on with the ladies and he watches, and does some touching as well. Then my husband and I have mind blowing sex.

[2LFM]

ok at the risk of sounding sexist this is my opinion. 1st the reason men love to see 2 girls together is because psycologically and physiologicly speaking men have a less vivid imagination than women and have less emotional connection to physical pleasure. Men are also more acutley sensitive to external stimulation from visual and auditory cues. Women are less sensitive to visual and auditory cues and more sensitive to touch and smell than men. Also women have a generally much more active imagination which results in much more pleasurable fantasies without real life stimulation.
Also as far as why 2 women are more pleasing on the eye than 2 men.... Well again a genticly driven thing. Besides the sociological standards put forth by the vanilla society its what the genders were built for. Men were built to be labor workers. Mens bodies are designed to do work effeciantly. Nothing else. Men were not designed to be gental or soft. Althought many like myself are "fluffy" LOL . The standard male form is tall muscular and hairy. While many women find this attractive it was not meant to be attractive it was meant to be functional. Women were created not as workers. They were created for procreation and partnership. They were basically created to fulfill man. That being said Woman was designed to be attractive, to be sexual beings, to fulfill the desire for human contact, and to carry, birth, and nurture children. So if women were basically designed to please men wouldnt haveing/seeing 2 of them be even better than 1. And because they were designed to be visually pleasing and designed to have a nurturing touch shouldnt other women also find this desirable?

All of that being said. I make no generalazations. no 100% of anyone thinks any 1 thing. But these things are commonly accepted scientific theroies that i so happen to belive. I am not saying in any way that women can not be providers and men cant be nurturers or any of that shit.... just what they were originally intended for.

That is all.
Mr. 2LFM