If we can't have an open dialog that includes all opinions - whether they are right or not they are still prevailing opinion -- then we can not hope to even understand the tip of this issue
That is what we are doing. You gave your opinion now he is giving his.
If someone were to ask "why do some people not like people that are fat?" -- would the respondant be wrong to answer with his opinions? How can we possibly expect to understand a circumstance if we can't present the facts and opinions involved? Should fat people then be offended by the presented opinions?
No a respondant would not be wrong to answer with his opinions. It is also not wrong if someone responded to his opinions saying that they are wrong. You are saying he should not be able to state his opinion if his opinion is that yours are wrong. Fat people can be offended by anything they want. |