Quote:
Originally Posted by widowerman  Is sex 90% visual? As in, the object of your affection has to be great looking, good looking, somewhat good looking, who the hell is looking? |
No, for me it isn't really 90% visual. But then again, we all have our definition of great/good/ok looking...if we go by the societal definition of good looking/hot...then definitely no. Some men that I have been exceptionally attracted to, if looking in for a more objective angle I have thought 'Well he's not quite GQ material (traditionally handsome)...but I think he's the hottest ticket out there.' So it's all subjective.
I'll use Jeff as an example of what I mean. And I don't say these things to be mean...and God knows I have plenty of my own that I could work on...but this is just for the sake of arguement here. He's mid-40s, lots of grey hair that has a spot that's thinning, has what I call 'man belly' that plenty of men his age have, can come across as an arrogant ass at times. Well, if I think about it that way (ie possibly the way someone who isn't smitten with him) then of course he doesn't sound particuarly attractive. But I guess most of the time that's now how I see him. He's not drop dead gorgeous, but he's certainly not a 'omg, I hope no one I know sees me with this guy'.
And there have been some playmates that just had that certain something about them. Again, not societally handsome/good looking...but they were undeniably hot to me.
Quote:
|
Second, question: would you have sex with just about anything that is available?
|
No.