[good times]

If we got an email phrased the way this one is that you got, we would have done the exact same thing. The way it reads to me is that, "we can't get what we really want, so we will settle for you." So no, we would pass, wouldn't even think twice about it.

I would be especially leery of it because you are listed as bi, it wouldn't surprise me at all if they agreed to start with G/G play and then move on to swap, and then when the time came, bail on you after the G/G play, I've seen it happen before.

We have actually started giving a lot more importance to how things are stated in a profile or email, based on our experience, than we used to in the past. We have noticed that even something so insignificant as the order something is said can indicate to us what they are primarily interested in. Since Mrs. GT is straight and has no interest in G/G play whatsoever, it makes it a little easier for us than someone who is open to G/G play though. What we have found is that if a profile emphasizes seeking a single female over couples we will almost always pass on them. While we have played with probably as many couples with a bi-female as not, it seems like the ones we have problems with, for example, the women that think they are the one who is going to convert Mrs. GT, are the ones who emphasize looking for single females in their profile. It has gotten to the point for us that, if their profile says "looking for couples and single females" we would probably respond back to them positively, but if it says "looking for single females and couples" they will probably get a "no thanks".