Quote:
Originally Posted by Overthetop  I'm just still wondering why we don't hear more about fakers if this is the case? |
Its incontinence not faking. When my wife was "squirting" she didn't even know she did it. She wasn't faking.
Quote:
|
And why don't they find it to be ALL urine when analyzed?
|
Let me quote from a 'pro' squirting article...
Definitely Not Urine
They and other researchers analyzed female ejaculatory fluid and found that it is not urine, but rather a combination of dilute urine and secretions from the paraurethral glands that chemically resemble prostate secretions in men. But how could women produce prostate fluid when they have no prostate?
So this article says its not urine, and then says it is urine and other secretions. I have no problem believing that women secrete some substances like men would, I have a huge problem thinking its a giant stream that can go several feet.
Quote:
|
...And what about those skenes glands?
|
Too small to produce enough fluid and no place to store it in the volume required to 'squirt'. I'm not saying they don't exist I'm saying they are not capable. Small ejaculations may indeed by 'real' but if you need towels, there is pee involved. I'm going to assume if drinking was involved the piss will be mostly colorless and very dilute. This concept is in fact a current working theory for 'squirting'.
Quote:
Maybe I shall just have to admit that I like to taste female "urine"?
OTT
|
If you like, but non-concentrated urine will be almost like drinking sterile water.