View Single Post
Old 06-14-2006, 09:56 AM   #12 (permalink)
Chicup
Not a potential ***
 
Chicup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,093
Location: Under the bed
Status: Tired

Chicup is beyond repute Chicup is beyond repute Chicup is beyond repute Chicup is beyond repute Chicup is beyond repute Chicup is beyond repute Chicup is beyond repute Chicup is beyond repute Chicup is beyond repute Chicup is beyond repute Chicup is beyond repute
Default Re: Are threesomes better than foursomes?

Quote:
Originally Posted by WesternSwing
I think many couples want couples and single females rather than couples and single males, or couples, single females, and single males. You completely left out the single male aspect. I think this is the real question: why couples and single females and not couples and single males?
I think you are correct in your reasons but the other issue not being talked about is the bi issue. Most FMF's are really FFM's (to use the code). A FMF with both women straight might be great for the guy, but I don't see there being much of the point for the female. So you have a bi-wife, you are new to swinging, you think single males are preditory, you want an FMF and not a MFM.

This being said I do see a good number of couples who's first experiance was an MFM. The reasons I think for this are the same as you laid out, only from the womans stand point. An MFM is HER fantasy and she won't feel threatened by another female. MFM's are also 100* easier to get than a FMF, and 10* than a MFMF so there is that too.
Chicup is offline