Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Concupiscence Honestly, I didn't feel comfortable about contributing because I am not "officially" a swapper as of yet. Of course this doesn't stop me from having opinions on it. |
Sometimes the best Wikipedians are the ones who are less passionate and more objective about the contributions that they're making.
For example, I was considering an alteration to the 'moral objections' section that used a page from the
Liberated Christians web site as a reference, but I realized at the last minute that the change that I was about to make was not neutral and objective because the reference page is clear advocacy and I was using it to back up a statement that also would have been seen as advocay by any non-swinger. So I'm going to add it as an "External Link" instead so that readers can come to their own conclusions.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Concupiscence The discussion about the editing is almost more interesting than the main page itself! Certainly does give one a better understanding about how diverse the views on the topic are. |
I thought so too. It's kind of like reading threads on these forums, except that people here are generally more qualified on the subject matter.