Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kittylikesmfm i haven't given it the old college try with google, but that is not exactly a reputable site. i've never seen any scientific explanation of squirting. i'm certainly not denying copious amounts of vaginal secretions at all..lol...by any means. what i am firmly disputing though is that
a: women squirt anything other than urine out of their urethras (per the post made by txduo2000)
and
b: that something other than the womans own deliberate vaginal constriction would cause her to "squirt" her vaginal secretions.
i mean, there is no confined area for the fluid to build up velocity to squirt like it does from the man's urethra. (and up front, i mean this as a friendly debate, not trying to argue.) i think most of what we see in movies is fx and cool pussy tricks. i'd really like to see an explanation/discussion of it from a large university site or an article written by an M.D. |
Actually, it is a fluid very similar to prostatic fluid. While I realize that women do not have a prostate, and therefore nowhere other than the bladder to "store" this fluid, I can attest to the fact that I DO squirt, and it is not a gush of vaginal secretions.
The fluid is "created" and "built up", if you will during the act of sex and included in the arousal process of women. It is "stored" in the bladder during that time. It is excreted through the urethra. It is definitely clear, and for the most part, odorless and tasteless, depending on diet. And it is most definitely not urine, though I suppose if the bladder isn't completely empty during the "build up", some urine would be included in the ejaculatory fluid. But the composition is most definitely NOT of the same texture or chemical make-up as urine alone. It most certainly is not vaginal secretions, as it is definitely expelled through the urethra, which would be physically impossible as the urethral and vaginal openings are two separate openings. Close by to one another, yes, but separate all the same.
You know, I understand your reticence in believing this, however, it has only been in the last 20 years that it has been finally PROVEN that the "g-spot" is not a matter of fiction, as it was thought to be at one time. I can attest that I have one of those too ... my husband has felt it, and works on it often to get me to squirt.
And honestly, kitty ... google is a wonderful search engine. It has surpassed Yahoo in the past 5 years and is the widely used search engine on the net. Does that confirm that it is "reputable"? No, I suppose not, but I also cannot fathom why people would continue to use it for research, over and over again, and be able to find reputable sites through google, why it is so universally accepted as reputable if it were not. To borrow a slogan from another merchant ... "Google ... funny name, serious search engine." LOL
Definitely take the time to at least read some of the articles for which others have posted links in this thread. There is plenty of scientific research and proof of female ejaculation and the g-spot out there.
You know ... I don't believe in ghosts, but I know people who do. So I understand skepticism. It generally occurs in people who have never actually experienced something that someone else has and they, themselves, just don't believe that it actually happens. I have friends who believe in ghosts ... they say that they have been in contact with ghosts, or seen phenomena in their homes or homes of others that solidify their belief in ghosts. Never happened to me. And until it does, I will continue to not believe in ghosts. I kind of equate your skepticism about g-spots and female ejaculation to my skepticism about ghosts; until you actually experience it or witness it in action, you may not ever believe it.