Quote:
|
Originally Posted by themonster Quote:
... more ridiculous affirmation that it should be ok (response) if you post the entire statement you will not lose the context of this statement ...here it is....
... more ridiculous affirmation that it should be ok to lose total control over your bodily functions to the point that you are not aware that someone is "raping, molesting, or assaulting " you because you have a "protector".
Are you disagreeing that it is ridiculous to lose total control over your bodily functions to the point of unconsciousness and put yourself at risk??? More to the point should that be something we should be applauding and promoting? I would hope not......this is a STATEMENT that I'm quite sure the vast majority of intelligent people would agree with, not a personal attack.
|
I think what you are not seeing here is the fact that no matter how much you drink, or what state you are in, it does not give anyone the go ahead to assault you or molest you in any way. I am not saying that we should promote drinking until passing out, I am saying we need to place the blame where it belongs, on the more heinous action, the boss being allowed to manhandle her while she was incapacitated.
If we went by what you are saying, we could say someone who is raped while unconscious should be held partially responsible for the attack because she got that drunk. Sorry but there is no situation where this kind of activity can be approved of or allowed, regardless of the mental state of the person at the time of the activity.
I think the reason we see your comments as personal attacks is that you imply that because we are not agreeing with your statements are not logical intellegent people or that our opinons are not credible or are in some way ridiculous. You can deemen others without name calling or derogetory remarks.