hmmmm???? ok....there is a serious lack of comprehension here. (statement of fact, not attack) here's why:
Your post of my "quotes" and my responses:
Ok, here you go.
Here's a few examples:
Quote:
... more ridiculous affirmation that it should be ok (response) if you post the entire statement you will not lose the context of this statement ...here it is....
... more ridiculous affirmation that it should be ok to lose total control over your bodily functions to the point that you are not aware that someone is "raping, molesting, or assaulting " you because you have a "protector".
Are you disagreeing that it is ridiculous to lose total control over your bodily functions to the point of unconsciousness and put yourself at risk??? More to the point should that be something we should be applauding and promoting? I would hope not......this is a STATEMENT that I'm quite sure the vast majority of intelligent people would agree with, not a personal attack.
Quote:
one more to further illustrate the lack of credible thinking here....... (response) Again, I will complete the quote so as not to be taken out of context...so as not to confuse, this is a quote of me qouting the "uncredible thoughts"
one more to further illustrate the lack of credible thinking here......."you can sugar coat it anyway you want...rape=rape=rape....molest=molest=molest!!! "
........and then in the same post a few sentances later.... "The next time he may allow this person or some other one to actually rape her..."
....to which I resonded ""actually rape her"???...wait a second.....I thought you were so dead set on the fact that it WAS rape and molesting the FIRST time????" Good point indeed if I do say so myself.
These thoughts(statements) ARE in fact NOT credible. When you say one thing and then in the same paragraph state something completely contradictory it's safe to say most intelligent people would see this as not credible, after all, which are you to believe? Again a statement of fact with no personal attack.
Quote:
I see politics in your future.....(response) ok, now this one I can see that if the humor sneaks by that it could be taken the wrong way. However I anticipated that not everyone would recognize my humor so I put one of those GIANT smiling smileyfaces there to make sure....that should've sufficed.
And for the record it was making reference to saying one thing one minute and another the next.....just like a politician....see, that's pretty funny(and unfortunately true)
<----another giant smiley face....
Quote:
I have however thoroughly shown where some have said conflicting and ridiculous things, yes,... (response) ...well this one really should need no response as it seems self explanatory, but nonetheless.....it is in response to this.... "I can appreciate it when people have differing opions, however I don't appreciate it when you take it to a level where you feel you have to personally attack others for having a differing opinon. " ....and I was quite simply explaining that some conflicting and ridiculous things ARE being said. And they are......if I was to personally attack someone it would be just that...personal......something like (hypothetically speaking)"your momma's so ugly.......", or "who's watchin' the trailer park", or "when you fell from the stupid tree you sure hit a lot of branches", or downright derrogatory stuff that's just not my style at all and you all know what that stuff is I think anyway.
The above quotes, taken from your last few posts, are what we consider personal attacks on this board. (response) It should now be pretty clear the lack of personal attacks and we can continue disagreeing on this one....but who knows, we might just find each other on the same side sometime, you never know.
